DNA methylation age and perceived age in elderly Danish twins

Birgit Debrabant, Mette Soerensen, Lene Christiansen, Qihua Tan, Matt McGue, Kaare Christensen, Jacob Hjelmborg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Perceived age is an easily accessible biomarker of aging. Here, we studied its relation to DNA methylation age (DNAm age) as introduced in (Horvath, 2013) in 180 elderly Danish twins. We found perceived age and DNAm age to be associated with chronological age (P = 0.04 resp. P = 2.2e-10) when correcting for gender, but did not see an association between perceived age and DNAm age (P = 0.44). Intrapair-analysis showed that the proportion of pairs where the twin with the highest perceived age also had the highest DNAm age was not different from 0.5 (P = 1), and we did not see a trend when dividing pairs according to their difference in perceived age (P = 0.36). Hence, intrapair analysis did not reveal links between perceived age and DNAm age. Moreover, none of the 353 CpGs underlying DNAm age was individually associated with perceived age after correction for multiple-testing (P > 6e-4, FDR > 0.21). Finally, when constructing an epigenetic signature based on these CpGs to predict perceived age, we only found a correlation of 0.18 (95%CI: −0.06 to 0.40) and a mean square error of 13.6 years2 between observed and predicted values in the test dataset, indicating poor predictive strength. Altogether, our results suggest that perceived age and DNAm age capture different aging aspects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-44
Number of pages5
JournalMechanisms of Ageing and Development
Volume169
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2018

Fingerprint

DNA Methylation
Epigenomics
Biomarkers

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Twin Study

Cite this

Debrabant, B., Soerensen, M., Christiansen, L., Tan, Q., McGue, M., Christensen, K., & Hjelmborg, J. (2018). DNA methylation age and perceived age in elderly Danish twins. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 169, 40-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2017.09.004

DNA methylation age and perceived age in elderly Danish twins. / Debrabant, Birgit; Soerensen, Mette; Christiansen, Lene; Tan, Qihua; McGue, Matt; Christensen, Kaare; Hjelmborg, Jacob.

In: Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, Vol. 169, 01.2018, p. 40-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Debrabant, B, Soerensen, M, Christiansen, L, Tan, Q, McGue, M, Christensen, K & Hjelmborg, J 2018, 'DNA methylation age and perceived age in elderly Danish twins', Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 169, pp. 40-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2017.09.004
Debrabant, Birgit ; Soerensen, Mette ; Christiansen, Lene ; Tan, Qihua ; McGue, Matt ; Christensen, Kaare ; Hjelmborg, Jacob. / DNA methylation age and perceived age in elderly Danish twins. In: Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 2018 ; Vol. 169. pp. 40-44.
@article{4fa15f2bcb804ebf912592f70eb38db7,
title = "DNA methylation age and perceived age in elderly Danish twins",
abstract = "Perceived age is an easily accessible biomarker of aging. Here, we studied its relation to DNA methylation age (DNAm age) as introduced in (Horvath, 2013) in 180 elderly Danish twins. We found perceived age and DNAm age to be associated with chronological age (P = 0.04 resp. P = 2.2e-10) when correcting for gender, but did not see an association between perceived age and DNAm age (P = 0.44). Intrapair-analysis showed that the proportion of pairs where the twin with the highest perceived age also had the highest DNAm age was not different from 0.5 (P = 1), and we did not see a trend when dividing pairs according to their difference in perceived age (P = 0.36). Hence, intrapair analysis did not reveal links between perceived age and DNAm age. Moreover, none of the 353 CpGs underlying DNAm age was individually associated with perceived age after correction for multiple-testing (P > 6e-4, FDR > 0.21). Finally, when constructing an epigenetic signature based on these CpGs to predict perceived age, we only found a correlation of 0.18 (95{\%}CI: −0.06 to 0.40) and a mean square error of 13.6 years2 between observed and predicted values in the test dataset, indicating poor predictive strength. Altogether, our results suggest that perceived age and DNAm age capture different aging aspects.",
author = "Birgit Debrabant and Mette Soerensen and Lene Christiansen and Qihua Tan and Matt McGue and Kaare Christensen and Jacob Hjelmborg",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.mad.2017.09.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "169",
pages = "40--44",
journal = "Mechanisms of Ageing and Development",
issn = "0047-6374",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - DNA methylation age and perceived age in elderly Danish twins

AU - Debrabant, Birgit

AU - Soerensen, Mette

AU - Christiansen, Lene

AU - Tan, Qihua

AU - McGue, Matt

AU - Christensen, Kaare

AU - Hjelmborg, Jacob

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - Perceived age is an easily accessible biomarker of aging. Here, we studied its relation to DNA methylation age (DNAm age) as introduced in (Horvath, 2013) in 180 elderly Danish twins. We found perceived age and DNAm age to be associated with chronological age (P = 0.04 resp. P = 2.2e-10) when correcting for gender, but did not see an association between perceived age and DNAm age (P = 0.44). Intrapair-analysis showed that the proportion of pairs where the twin with the highest perceived age also had the highest DNAm age was not different from 0.5 (P = 1), and we did not see a trend when dividing pairs according to their difference in perceived age (P = 0.36). Hence, intrapair analysis did not reveal links between perceived age and DNAm age. Moreover, none of the 353 CpGs underlying DNAm age was individually associated with perceived age after correction for multiple-testing (P > 6e-4, FDR > 0.21). Finally, when constructing an epigenetic signature based on these CpGs to predict perceived age, we only found a correlation of 0.18 (95%CI: −0.06 to 0.40) and a mean square error of 13.6 years2 between observed and predicted values in the test dataset, indicating poor predictive strength. Altogether, our results suggest that perceived age and DNAm age capture different aging aspects.

AB - Perceived age is an easily accessible biomarker of aging. Here, we studied its relation to DNA methylation age (DNAm age) as introduced in (Horvath, 2013) in 180 elderly Danish twins. We found perceived age and DNAm age to be associated with chronological age (P = 0.04 resp. P = 2.2e-10) when correcting for gender, but did not see an association between perceived age and DNAm age (P = 0.44). Intrapair-analysis showed that the proportion of pairs where the twin with the highest perceived age also had the highest DNAm age was not different from 0.5 (P = 1), and we did not see a trend when dividing pairs according to their difference in perceived age (P = 0.36). Hence, intrapair analysis did not reveal links between perceived age and DNAm age. Moreover, none of the 353 CpGs underlying DNAm age was individually associated with perceived age after correction for multiple-testing (P > 6e-4, FDR > 0.21). Finally, when constructing an epigenetic signature based on these CpGs to predict perceived age, we only found a correlation of 0.18 (95%CI: −0.06 to 0.40) and a mean square error of 13.6 years2 between observed and predicted values in the test dataset, indicating poor predictive strength. Altogether, our results suggest that perceived age and DNAm age capture different aging aspects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031318392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031318392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.mad.2017.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.mad.2017.09.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 28965790

AN - SCOPUS:85031318392

VL - 169

SP - 40

EP - 44

JO - Mechanisms of Ageing and Development

JF - Mechanisms of Ageing and Development

SN - 0047-6374

ER -