DNA damage checkpoint responses in the S phase of synchronized diploid human fibroblasts

Paul D. Chastain, Bruna P. Brylawski, Yingchun C. Zhou, Shangbang Rao, Haitao Chu, Joseph G. Ibrahim, William K. Kaufmann, Marila Cordeiro-Stone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


We investigated the hypothesis that the strength of the activation of the intra-S DNA damage checkpoint varies within the S phase. Synchronized diploid human fibroblasts were exposed to either 0 or 2.5 J m-2 UVC in early, mid- and late-S phase. The endpoints measured were the following: (1) radio-resistant DNA synthesis (RDS), (2) induction of Chk1 phosphorylation, (3) initiation of new replicons and (4) length of replication tracks synthesized after irradiation. RDS analysis showed that global DNA synthesis was inhibited by approximately the same extent (30 ± 12%), regardless of when during S phase the fibroblasts were exposed to UVC. Western blot analysis revealed that the UVC-induced phosphorylation of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) on serine 345 was high in early and mid S but 10-fold lower in late S. DNA fiber immunostaining studies indicated that the replication fork displacement rate decreased in irradiated cells at the three time points examined; however, replicon initiation was inhibited strongly in early and mid S, but this response was attenuated in late S. These results suggest that the intra-S checkpoint activated by UVC-induced DNA damage is not as robust toward the end of S phase in its inhibition of the latest firing origins in human fibroblasts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-116
Number of pages8
JournalPhotochemistry and Photobiology
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 The Authors. Photochemistry and Photobiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Photobiology.


Dive into the research topics of 'DNA damage checkpoint responses in the S phase of synchronized diploid human fibroblasts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this