Distribution of Salmonella in swine production ecosystems

David A. Barber, Peter B. Bahnson, Richard Isaacson, Carl J. Jones, Ronald M. Weigel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this 2-year field survey was to sample multiple ecological compartments within swine production systems to identify potential sources of Salmonella infection for swine. Twelve single-site production systems within Illinois were identified by slaughter sampling to have detectable Salmonella in swine and therefore selected for study. There were four visits to each farm during a 5-month period. Fecal samples were obtained from swine and other wild and domestic mammals. Arthropods and environmental samples of feed, water, pen floors, boots, and bird feces were also collected. All 8,066 samples obtained were cultured to detect Salmonella. Salmonella was detected on 11 of the 12 farms. There were 206 positive cultures, including samples from swine (83), pen floors (54), boots (32), flies (16), mice (9), cats (3), and birds (3). Swine shedding Salmonella in feces were detected on 9 of the 12 farms. The more Salmonella-abundant ecological compartments were cats (12% of samples positive), boots (11%), bird feces (8%), flies (6%), and mice (5%); 2.1% of 4,024 swine samples were positive. All 221 feed samples were negative for Salmonella. There was a correlation between a farm having a high prevalence of shedding Salmonella in pigs and a high abundance on pen floors, flies, and boots. The most common serotypes detected were Derby, Agona, Worthington, and Uganda, which were distributed throughout the ecosystem, suggesting widespread transmission across ecological compartments. The ubiquitous distribution of Salmonella suggests that an effective control strategy must target multiple compartments of the swine production ecosystem.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1861-1868
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Food Protection
Volume65
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2002

Fingerprint

Salmonella
Ecosystem
Swine
ecosystems
swine
Feces
sampling
Diptera
Birds
farms
feces
birds
production technology
Cats
cats
swine production
Uganda
Arthropods
Salmonella Infections
mice

Cite this

Distribution of Salmonella in swine production ecosystems. / Barber, David A.; Bahnson, Peter B.; Isaacson, Richard; Jones, Carl J.; Weigel, Ronald M.

In: Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 65, No. 12, 01.12.2002, p. 1861-1868.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barber, David A. ; Bahnson, Peter B. ; Isaacson, Richard ; Jones, Carl J. ; Weigel, Ronald M. / Distribution of Salmonella in swine production ecosystems. In: Journal of Food Protection. 2002 ; Vol. 65, No. 12. pp. 1861-1868.
@article{58cf6a3fc83849ccb852da31c2d6013a,
title = "Distribution of Salmonella in swine production ecosystems",
abstract = "The objective of this 2-year field survey was to sample multiple ecological compartments within swine production systems to identify potential sources of Salmonella infection for swine. Twelve single-site production systems within Illinois were identified by slaughter sampling to have detectable Salmonella in swine and therefore selected for study. There were four visits to each farm during a 5-month period. Fecal samples were obtained from swine and other wild and domestic mammals. Arthropods and environmental samples of feed, water, pen floors, boots, and bird feces were also collected. All 8,066 samples obtained were cultured to detect Salmonella. Salmonella was detected on 11 of the 12 farms. There were 206 positive cultures, including samples from swine (83), pen floors (54), boots (32), flies (16), mice (9), cats (3), and birds (3). Swine shedding Salmonella in feces were detected on 9 of the 12 farms. The more Salmonella-abundant ecological compartments were cats (12{\%} of samples positive), boots (11{\%}), bird feces (8{\%}), flies (6{\%}), and mice (5{\%}); 2.1{\%} of 4,024 swine samples were positive. All 221 feed samples were negative for Salmonella. There was a correlation between a farm having a high prevalence of shedding Salmonella in pigs and a high abundance on pen floors, flies, and boots. The most common serotypes detected were Derby, Agona, Worthington, and Uganda, which were distributed throughout the ecosystem, suggesting widespread transmission across ecological compartments. The ubiquitous distribution of Salmonella suggests that an effective control strategy must target multiple compartments of the swine production ecosystem.",
author = "Barber, {David A.} and Bahnson, {Peter B.} and Richard Isaacson and Jones, {Carl J.} and Weigel, {Ronald M.}",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4315/0362-028X-65.12.1861",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "1861--1868",
journal = "Journal of Food Protection",
issn = "0362-028X",
publisher = "International Association for Food Protection",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distribution of Salmonella in swine production ecosystems

AU - Barber, David A.

AU - Bahnson, Peter B.

AU - Isaacson, Richard

AU - Jones, Carl J.

AU - Weigel, Ronald M.

PY - 2002/12/1

Y1 - 2002/12/1

N2 - The objective of this 2-year field survey was to sample multiple ecological compartments within swine production systems to identify potential sources of Salmonella infection for swine. Twelve single-site production systems within Illinois were identified by slaughter sampling to have detectable Salmonella in swine and therefore selected for study. There were four visits to each farm during a 5-month period. Fecal samples were obtained from swine and other wild and domestic mammals. Arthropods and environmental samples of feed, water, pen floors, boots, and bird feces were also collected. All 8,066 samples obtained were cultured to detect Salmonella. Salmonella was detected on 11 of the 12 farms. There were 206 positive cultures, including samples from swine (83), pen floors (54), boots (32), flies (16), mice (9), cats (3), and birds (3). Swine shedding Salmonella in feces were detected on 9 of the 12 farms. The more Salmonella-abundant ecological compartments were cats (12% of samples positive), boots (11%), bird feces (8%), flies (6%), and mice (5%); 2.1% of 4,024 swine samples were positive. All 221 feed samples were negative for Salmonella. There was a correlation between a farm having a high prevalence of shedding Salmonella in pigs and a high abundance on pen floors, flies, and boots. The most common serotypes detected were Derby, Agona, Worthington, and Uganda, which were distributed throughout the ecosystem, suggesting widespread transmission across ecological compartments. The ubiquitous distribution of Salmonella suggests that an effective control strategy must target multiple compartments of the swine production ecosystem.

AB - The objective of this 2-year field survey was to sample multiple ecological compartments within swine production systems to identify potential sources of Salmonella infection for swine. Twelve single-site production systems within Illinois were identified by slaughter sampling to have detectable Salmonella in swine and therefore selected for study. There were four visits to each farm during a 5-month period. Fecal samples were obtained from swine and other wild and domestic mammals. Arthropods and environmental samples of feed, water, pen floors, boots, and bird feces were also collected. All 8,066 samples obtained were cultured to detect Salmonella. Salmonella was detected on 11 of the 12 farms. There were 206 positive cultures, including samples from swine (83), pen floors (54), boots (32), flies (16), mice (9), cats (3), and birds (3). Swine shedding Salmonella in feces were detected on 9 of the 12 farms. The more Salmonella-abundant ecological compartments were cats (12% of samples positive), boots (11%), bird feces (8%), flies (6%), and mice (5%); 2.1% of 4,024 swine samples were positive. All 221 feed samples were negative for Salmonella. There was a correlation between a farm having a high prevalence of shedding Salmonella in pigs and a high abundance on pen floors, flies, and boots. The most common serotypes detected were Derby, Agona, Worthington, and Uganda, which were distributed throughout the ecosystem, suggesting widespread transmission across ecological compartments. The ubiquitous distribution of Salmonella suggests that an effective control strategy must target multiple compartments of the swine production ecosystem.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036909252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036909252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4315/0362-028X-65.12.1861

DO - 10.4315/0362-028X-65.12.1861

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 1861

EP - 1868

JO - Journal of Food Protection

JF - Journal of Food Protection

SN - 0362-028X

IS - 12

ER -