Abstract
James Sidman, MD, and Sherard A. Tatum, MD, address the following questions for discussion and debate. Is neonatal distraction osteogenesis (DO) better than lip-tongue adhesion or tracheotomy for micrognathic airway compromise? What role does DO have in adult orthognathic surgery situations? In monobloc and Le Fort III procedures, are internal or external devices preferable? What role does DO play in craniofacial microsomia? Is endoscopic DO better than open procedures for synostosis management? How has your technique changed or evolved over the past 5years and what has doing this technique taught you?.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 139-146 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2014 |
Keywords
- Craniofacial surgery
- Distraction osseogenesis
- Distraction osteogenesis
- Facial skeletal surgery
- Maxillofacial surgery
- Orthognathic surgery
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Distraction Osteogenesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS