Disruption of disulfide bonds exhibits differential effects on trafficking of regulated secretory proteins

Sven Ulrik Gorr, Xue Fen Huang, Darrin J. Cowley, Regina Kuliawat, Peter Aryan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

For several secretory proteins, it has been hypothesized that disulfide- bonded loop structures are required for sorting to secretory granules. To explore this hypothesis, we employed dithiothreitol (DTT) treatment in live pancreatic islets, as well as in PC-12 and GH4C1 cells. In islets, disulfide reduction in the distal secretory pathway did not increase constitutive or constitutive-like secretion of proinsulin (or insulin). In PC-12 cells, DTT treatment caused a dramatic increase in unstimulated secretion of newly synthesized chromogranin B (CgB), presumably as a consequence of reducing the single conserved chromogranin disulfide bond (E. Chanat, U. Weiss, W. B. Huttner, and S. A. Tooze. EMBO J. 12: 2159-2168, 1993). However, in GH4C1 cells that also synthesize CgB endogenously, DTT treatment reduced newly synthesized prolactin and blocked its export, whereas newly synthesized CgB was routed normally to secretory granules. Moreover, on transient expression in GH4C1 cells, CgA and a CgA mutant lacking the conserved disulfide bond showed comparable multimeric aggregation properties and targeting to secretory granules, as measured by stimulated secretion assays. Thus the conformational perturbation of regulated secretory proteins caused by disulfide disruption leads to consequences in protein trafficking that are both protein and cell type dependent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)C121-C131
JournalAmerican Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology
Volume277
Issue number1 46-1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999

Keywords

  • Chromogranin
  • Insulin
  • Proinsulin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disruption of disulfide bonds exhibits differential effects on trafficking of regulated secretory proteins'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this