Discovery and broad relevance may be insignificant components of course-based undergraduate research experiences (CURES) for non-biology majors

Cissy J. Ballen, Seth K. Thompson, Jessamina E. Blum, Nicholas P. Newstrom, Sehoya Cotner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are a type of laboratory learning environment associated with a science course, in which undergraduates participate in novel research. According to Auchincloss et al. (CBE Life Sci Educ 2104; 13:29–40), CUREs are distinct from other laboratory learning environments because they possess five core design components, and while national calls to improve STEM education have led to an increase in CURE programs nationally, less work has specifically focused on which core components are critical to achieving desired student outcomes. Here we use a backward elimination experimental design to test the importance of two CURE components for a population of non-biology majors: the experience of discovery and the production of data broadly relevant to the scientific or local community. We found nonsignificant impacts of either laboratory component on students’ academic performance, science self-efficacy, sense of project ownership, and perceived value of the laboratory experience. Our results challenge the assumption that all core components of CUREs are essential to achieve positive student outcomes when applied at scale.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1515
JournalJournal of Microbiology and Biology Education
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Discovery and broad relevance may be insignificant components of course-based undergraduate research experiences (CURES) for non-biology majors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this