TY - JOUR
T1 - Discovering the Fabric of Supportive Conversations
T2 - A Typology of Speaking Turns and Their Contingencies
AU - Bodie, Graham D.
AU - Jones, Susanne M.
AU - Brinberg, Miriam
AU - Joyer, Amy M.
AU - Solomon, Denise Haunani
AU - Ram, Nilam
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2020/8/31
Y1 - 2020/8/31
N2 - This study examines messages that problem disclosers and supportive listeners enact during conversations about everyday stressors. We coded 402 dyadic interactions between strangers, friends, and romantic couples using Stiles’s (1992) verbal response modes (VRM) and Burleson’s (1982) verbal person centeredness (PC) typology to explore whether (a) listener and discloser utterances coalesce into types of speaking turns, (b) listener turn types vary in person-centered quality, (c) listener turns relate to discloser responses, and (d) discloser responses relate to listener turns. Analyses revealed a typology for both listener and discloser turns: acknowledgment, advisement, question, elaboration, hedged disclosure, and reflection. The relative proportion of those types varied as a function of conversational role and relationship context, and these speech acts varied only minimally in PC. Configural frequency analyses revealed four greater-than-chance contingencies across data sets. The discussion highlights implications for a dyadic and dynamic understanding of supportive communication.
AB - This study examines messages that problem disclosers and supportive listeners enact during conversations about everyday stressors. We coded 402 dyadic interactions between strangers, friends, and romantic couples using Stiles’s (1992) verbal response modes (VRM) and Burleson’s (1982) verbal person centeredness (PC) typology to explore whether (a) listener and discloser utterances coalesce into types of speaking turns, (b) listener turn types vary in person-centered quality, (c) listener turns relate to discloser responses, and (d) discloser responses relate to listener turns. Analyses revealed a typology for both listener and discloser turns: acknowledgment, advisement, question, elaboration, hedged disclosure, and reflection. The relative proportion of those types varied as a function of conversational role and relationship context, and these speech acts varied only minimally in PC. Configural frequency analyses revealed four greater-than-chance contingencies across data sets. The discussion highlights implications for a dyadic and dynamic understanding of supportive communication.
KW - comforting
KW - configural frequency analysis
KW - emotion regulation
KW - person centeredness
KW - social support
KW - supportive listening
KW - verbal response modes
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85090062812
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090062812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0261927x20953604
DO - 10.1177/0261927x20953604
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85090062812
SN - 0261-927X
VL - 40
SP - 214
EP - 237
JO - Journal of Language and Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Language and Social Psychology
IS - 2
ER -