Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Disclosure of preclinical alzheimer’s disease biomarker results in research and clinical settings: Why, how, and what we still need to know

  • Claire M. Erickson
  • , Nathaniel A. Chin
  • , Sterling C. Johnson
  • , Carey E. Gleason
  • , Lindsay R. Clark

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Disclosure of personal disease-related information to asymptomatic adults has been debated over the last century in medicine and research. Recently, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has been conceptualized as a continuum that begins with a “preclinical” stage in which biomarkers are present in the absence of cognitive impairment. Studies have begun assessing the safety, psychological, and behavioral effects of disclosing both AD-related genetic and biomarker information to cognitively unimpaired older adults. Yet, debate continues over the appropriate circumstances and methods for returning such information. This article outlines concerns with and rationale for AD biomarker disclosure and summarizes findings from prior studies. Overall, this article aims to describe and respond to key questions concerning disclosure of amyloid positron emission tomography scan results to asymptomatic adults in a research setting. Moving forward, such conditions are important to consider as interventions target the preclinical phase of AD and normalize disclosing biomarker information to cognitively unimpaired persons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere12150
JournalAlzheimer's and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors.

Keywords

  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Amyloid positron emission tomography
  • Disclosure
  • Future directions
  • Personal impact
  • Research impact

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disclosure of preclinical alzheimer’s disease biomarker results in research and clinical settings: Why, how, and what we still need to know'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this