Direct democracy, policy diffusion, and medicalized marijuana

Cynthia Rugeley, John Frendreis, Raymond Tatalovich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Virtually all studies of policy diffusion are based on statutory enactments by state legislatures. But a substantial number of medicalized marijuana laws were initiated through citizen initiatives and ratified by referenda (I and R). This case study suggests that the diffusion of laws adopted by I and R requires two modifications to the conventional model of policy diffusion. First, early policy adoptions must occur through direct democracy so that horizontal diffusion results when those past adoptions by the I and R process lead to future adoptions. Second, the necessity of bypassing institutions of representative government must be operationalized as an interaction between the availability of direct democracy and the precise political variable that blocks legislative enactments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)72-82
Number of pages11
JournalPolitics and the Life Sciences
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • direct democracy
  • medicalized marijuana
  • policy diffusion
  • referendum

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Direct democracy, policy diffusion, and medicalized marijuana'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this