Abstract
Large data sets from a state reading assessment for third and fifth graders were analyzed to examine differential item functioning (DIF), differential distractor functioning (DDF), and differential omission frequency (DOF) between students with particular categories of disabilities (speech/language impairments, learning disabilities, and emotional behavior disorders) and students without disabilities. Multinomial logistic regression was employed to compare response characteristic curves (RCCs) of individual test items. Although no evidence for serious test bias was found for the state assessment examined in this study, the results indicated that students in different disability categories showed different patterns of DIF, DDF, and DOF, and that the use of RCCs helps clarify the implications of DIF and DDF.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 28-40 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Differential distractor functioning
- Differential item functioning
- Disability
- Reading assessment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Differentials of a state reading assessment: Item functioning, distractor functioning, and omission frequency for disability categories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS