Differential neural activity patterns for spatial relations in humans: a MEG study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Children learn the words for above–below relations earlier than for left–right relations, despite treating these equally well in a simple visual categorization task. Even as adults—conflicts in congruency, such as when a stimulus is depicted in a spatially incongruent manner with respect to salient global cues—can be challenging. Here we investigated the neural correlates of encoding and maintaining in working memory above–below and left–right relational planes in 12 adults using magnetoencephalography in order to discover whether above–below relations are represented by the brain differently than left–right relations. Adults performed perfectly on the task behaviorally, so any differences in neural activity were attributed to the stimuli’s cognitive attributes. In comparing above–below to left–right relations during stimulus encoding, we found the greatest differences in neural activity in areas associated with space and movement. In comparing congruent to incongruent trials, we found the greatest differential activity in premotor areas. For both contrasts, brain areas involved in the encoding phase were also involved in the maintenance phase, which provides evidence that those brain areas are particularly important in representing the relational planes or congruency types throughout the trial. When comparing neural activity associated with the relational planes during working memory, additional right posterior areas were implicated, whereas the congruent-incongruent contrast implicated additional bilateral frontal and temporal areas. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis left–right relations are represented differently than above–below relations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)429-441
Number of pages13
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume234
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Brain
Magnetoencephalography
Motor Cortex
Maintenance

Keywords

  • Congruency
  • Encoding
  • Left–right confusion
  • MEG
  • Relational plane
  • Working memory

Cite this

Differential neural activity patterns for spatial relations in humans : a MEG study. / Scott, Nicole M.; Leuthold, Arthur C; Sera, Maria D; Georgopoulos, Apostolos P.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 234, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 429-441.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5250c08c66a34b8b8eb22afeaecf4634,
title = "Differential neural activity patterns for spatial relations in humans: a MEG study",
abstract = "Children learn the words for above–below relations earlier than for left–right relations, despite treating these equally well in a simple visual categorization task. Even as adults—conflicts in congruency, such as when a stimulus is depicted in a spatially incongruent manner with respect to salient global cues—can be challenging. Here we investigated the neural correlates of encoding and maintaining in working memory above–below and left–right relational planes in 12 adults using magnetoencephalography in order to discover whether above–below relations are represented by the brain differently than left–right relations. Adults performed perfectly on the task behaviorally, so any differences in neural activity were attributed to the stimuli’s cognitive attributes. In comparing above–below to left–right relations during stimulus encoding, we found the greatest differences in neural activity in areas associated with space and movement. In comparing congruent to incongruent trials, we found the greatest differential activity in premotor areas. For both contrasts, brain areas involved in the encoding phase were also involved in the maintenance phase, which provides evidence that those brain areas are particularly important in representing the relational planes or congruency types throughout the trial. When comparing neural activity associated with the relational planes during working memory, additional right posterior areas were implicated, whereas the congruent-incongruent contrast implicated additional bilateral frontal and temporal areas. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis left–right relations are represented differently than above–below relations.",
keywords = "Congruency, Encoding, Left–right confusion, MEG, Relational plane, Working memory",
author = "Scott, {Nicole M.} and Leuthold, {Arthur C} and Sera, {Maria D} and Georgopoulos, {Apostolos P}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-015-4467-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "234",
pages = "429--441",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential neural activity patterns for spatial relations in humans

T2 - a MEG study

AU - Scott, Nicole M.

AU - Leuthold, Arthur C

AU - Sera, Maria D

AU - Georgopoulos, Apostolos P

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Children learn the words for above–below relations earlier than for left–right relations, despite treating these equally well in a simple visual categorization task. Even as adults—conflicts in congruency, such as when a stimulus is depicted in a spatially incongruent manner with respect to salient global cues—can be challenging. Here we investigated the neural correlates of encoding and maintaining in working memory above–below and left–right relational planes in 12 adults using magnetoencephalography in order to discover whether above–below relations are represented by the brain differently than left–right relations. Adults performed perfectly on the task behaviorally, so any differences in neural activity were attributed to the stimuli’s cognitive attributes. In comparing above–below to left–right relations during stimulus encoding, we found the greatest differences in neural activity in areas associated with space and movement. In comparing congruent to incongruent trials, we found the greatest differential activity in premotor areas. For both contrasts, brain areas involved in the encoding phase were also involved in the maintenance phase, which provides evidence that those brain areas are particularly important in representing the relational planes or congruency types throughout the trial. When comparing neural activity associated with the relational planes during working memory, additional right posterior areas were implicated, whereas the congruent-incongruent contrast implicated additional bilateral frontal and temporal areas. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis left–right relations are represented differently than above–below relations.

AB - Children learn the words for above–below relations earlier than for left–right relations, despite treating these equally well in a simple visual categorization task. Even as adults—conflicts in congruency, such as when a stimulus is depicted in a spatially incongruent manner with respect to salient global cues—can be challenging. Here we investigated the neural correlates of encoding and maintaining in working memory above–below and left–right relational planes in 12 adults using magnetoencephalography in order to discover whether above–below relations are represented by the brain differently than left–right relations. Adults performed perfectly on the task behaviorally, so any differences in neural activity were attributed to the stimuli’s cognitive attributes. In comparing above–below to left–right relations during stimulus encoding, we found the greatest differences in neural activity in areas associated with space and movement. In comparing congruent to incongruent trials, we found the greatest differential activity in premotor areas. For both contrasts, brain areas involved in the encoding phase were also involved in the maintenance phase, which provides evidence that those brain areas are particularly important in representing the relational planes or congruency types throughout the trial. When comparing neural activity associated with the relational planes during working memory, additional right posterior areas were implicated, whereas the congruent-incongruent contrast implicated additional bilateral frontal and temporal areas. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis left–right relations are represented differently than above–below relations.

KW - Congruency

KW - Encoding

KW - Left–right confusion

KW - MEG

KW - Relational plane

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955650512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955650512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-015-4467-6

DO - 10.1007/s00221-015-4467-6

M3 - Article

VL - 234

SP - 429

EP - 441

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 2

ER -