Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Differential activity of PARP inhibitors in BRCA1- Versus BRCA2-altered metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

  • Fadi Taza
  • , Albert E. Holler
  • , Wei Fu
  • , Hao Wang
  • , Nabil Adra
  • , Costantine Albany
  • , Ryan Ashkar
  • , Heather H. Cheng
  • , Alexandra O. Sokolova
  • , Neeraj Agarwal
  • , Adam Kessel
  • , Alan Bryce
  • , Nellie Nafissi
  • , Pedro Barata
  • , A. Oliver Sartor
  • , Diogo Bastos
  • , Oren Smaletz
  • , Jacob E. Berchuck
  • , Mary Ellen Taplin
  • , Rahul Aggarwal
  • Cora N. Sternberg, Panagiotis J. Vlachostergios, Ajjai S. Alva, Christopher Su, Catherine H. Marshall, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE Two poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (olaparib and rucaparib) are US Food and Drug Administration–approved for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harboring BRCA1/2 mutations, but the relative efficacy of PARP inhibition in BRCA1- versus BRCA2-altered mCRPC is understudied. METHODS We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis involving 12 sites. We collected genomic and clinical data from 123 patients with BRCA1/2-altered mCRPC who were treated with PARP inhibitors. The primary efficacy end point was the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥ 50% PSA decline) rate. Secondary end points were PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), clinical or radiographic PFS, and overall survival. We compared clinical outcomes, and other genomic characteristics, among BRCA1- versus BRCA2-altered mCRPC. RESULTS A total of 123 patients (13 BRCA1 and 110 BRCA2) were included. PARP inhibitors used were olaparib (n = 116), rucaparib (n = 3), talazoparib (n = 2), and veliparib (n = 2). At diagnosis, 72% of patients had Gleason 8-10 disease. BRCA1 patients were more likely to have metastatic disease at presentation (69% v 37%; P = .04). Age, baseline PSA, metastatic distribution, and types of previous systemic therapies were similar between groups. There were equal proportions of germline mutations (51% v 46%; P = .78) in both groups. BRCA1 patients had more monoallelic (56% v 41%; P = .49) and concurrent TP53 (55% v 36%; P = .32) mutations. PSA50 responses in BRCA1- versus BRCA2-altered patients were 23% versus 63%, respectively (P = .01). BRCA2 patients achieved longer PSA-PFS (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 0.92 to 4.09; P = .08), PFS (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 0.99 to 4.40; P = .05), and overall survival (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.32 to 6.83; P = .008). Biallelic (compared with monoallelic) mutations, truncating (compared with missense) mutations, and absence of a concurrent TP53 mutation were associated with PARP inhibitor sensitivity. CONCLUSION PARP inhibitor efficacy is diminished in BRCA1- versus BRCA2-altered mCRPC. This is not due to an imbalance in germline mutations but might be related to more monoallelic mutations and/or concurrent TP53 alterations in the BRCA1 group.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1200-1220
Number of pages21
JournalJCO Precision Oncology
Volume5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differential activity of PARP inhibitors in BRCA1- Versus BRCA2-altered metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this