Differences between tethered polyelectrolyte chains on bare mica and hydrophobically modified mica

Feng Li, Marc Balastre, Phillip Schorr, J. F. Argillier, Jinchuan Yang, Jimmy W. Mays, Matthew Tirrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study investigates the structures of layers of amphiphilic diblock copolymers of poly(t-butyl styrene)-poly(styrene sulfonate) (PtBS-PSS) adsorbed on both the bare mica surface (hydrophilic) and an octadecyltriethoxysilane (OTE)-modified mica surface (hydrophobic). When the surface is rendered hydrophobic, the nonsoluble block exhibits stronger interaction with the surface and higher adsorbed masses are achieved. Interaction forces between two such adsorbed layers on both substrates were measured using the surface forces apparatus. The effect of salt concentration (C s) and molecular weight (N) on the height of the self-assembled layers (L s) was examined in each case. The resulting scaling relationship is in good agreement with predictions of the brush model, L 0 ∝ N 1.0 in the low-salt limit and L 0N -1 ∝ (C s/σ) -0.32 in the salted regime, when adsorption takes place onto the hydrophobized mica surface. For adsorption on the bare mica surface, L 0N -0.7 ∝ C s -0.17 agrees with the scaling prediction of the sparse tethering model. The results suggest that, on the hydrophilic bare mica surface, the adsorbed amount is not high enough to form a brush structure and only very little intermolecular stretching of the tethered chains occurs; in contrast, the presence of the hydrophobic OTE layer increases the tethering density such that the polyelectrolyte chains adopt a brush conformation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4084-4091
Number of pages8
JournalLangmuir
Volume22
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 25 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences between tethered polyelectrolyte chains on bare mica and hydrophobically modified mica'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this