Diagnostic reframing of intractable environmental problems: Case of a contested multiparty public land-use conflict

Stanley T. Asah, David N. Bengston, Keith Wendt, Kristen C. Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Intractable conflicts are omnipresent in environmental management. These conflicts do not necessarily resist resolution but need to be fundamentally transformed in order to reach agreement. Reframing, a process that allows disputants to create new alternative understandings of the problem, is one way of transforming these conflicts. Cognitive and interactional reframing are the two major approaches to conflict transformation. These approaches have some drawbacks. Cognitive reframing does not guarantee commensurate consideration of all disputants' views about the problem. Interactional reframing is prone to inter-disputant influences that interfere with presenting the problems as accurately as they exist in disputants' minds. Inadequate consideration of other disputants' views and inter-disputant influences often lead to inaccurate problem identification and definition. This in turn leads to solving the wrong problem, enabling intractability to persist. Proper problem identification and definition requires commensurate consideration of all sides of the conflict while minimizing inter-disputant influences. From a problem diagnosis perspective, we show how Q methodology is used to reframe environmental problems, rendering them more tractable to analysis while minimizing the influence of who disputants are talking with, and without ignoring the perspectives of other disputants. Using a case of contentious All-Terrain Vehicle (ATV) use in a state-administered public land, conflicting parties reframed the problem by prioritizing issues, outlining areas and levels of consensus and disagreement, and revealing inherent unrecognized and/or unspoken agendas. The reframing process surprisingly revealed several areas of common ground in disputants' diagnosis of the problem, including lack of emphasis on environmental protection and uncoordinated management factions. Emergent frames were misaligned on some issues, such as the behaviors of ATV riders and the role of management, including political and economic influences on decision making. We discuss how the reframing process enhances tractability of multiparty environmental problems. We point to some limitations of Q methodology as a tool for the diagnostic reframing of such problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)108-119
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume108
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 2012

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Cognitive reframing
  • Consensus
  • Diagnostic reframing
  • Interactional reframing
  • Intractable environmental conflict
  • Q methodology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic reframing of intractable environmental problems: Case of a contested multiparty public land-use conflict'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this