Diagnosing blame: Responsibility and the psychopath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

The diagnosis of psychopathy is controversial largely because of two notions: first, that because of their defects, psychopaths cannot understand morality, and second, that these defects should thus excuse psychopaths from moral responsibility for their actions. However, it is not clear just what is involved in understanding morality. The argument that the psychopath is ignorant of morality in the same way that one might be ignorant of facts is difficult to sustain. However, a closer examination of the psychopath’s peculiar deficiencies reveals that the psychopath’s understanding of morality might be impaired in other ways.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-214
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Medicine and Philosophy (United Kingdom)
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1992
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Disease
  • Ethics
  • Philosophy
  • Psychiatry
  • Psychopathy
  • Responsibility

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnosing blame: Responsibility and the psychopath'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this