Developments in Agricultural Soil Quality and Health: Reflections by the Research Committee on Soil Organic Matter Management

Michelle M. Wander, Larry J. Cihacek, Mark Coyne, Rhae A. Drijber, Julie M. Grossman, Jessica L.M. Gutknecht, William R. Horwath, Sindhu Jagadamma, Daniel C. Olk, Matt Ruark, Sieglinde S. Snapp, Lisa K. Tiemann, Ray Weil, Ronald F. Turco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

The North Central Education and Research Activity Committee (NCERA-59) was formed in 1952 to address how soil organic matter formation and management practices affect soil structure and productivity. It is in this capacity that we comment on the science supporting soil quality and associated soil health assessment for agricultural lands with the goal of hastening progress in this important field. Even though the suite of soil quality indicators being applied by U.S. soil health efforts closely mirrors the “minimum data set” we developed and recommended in the mid-1990s, we question whether the methods or means for their selection and development are sufficient to meet current and emerging soil health challenges. The rush to enshrine a standard suite of dated measures may be incompatible with longer-term goals. Legitimate study of soil health considers soil change accrued over years to decades that influence on- and off-site function. Tailoring of methods to local conditions is needed to effectively apply and interpret indicators for different soil resource regions and land uses. Adherence to a set suite of methods selected by subjective criteria should be avoided, particularly when we do not yet have adequate data or agreed upon interpretive frameworks for many so-called “Tier 1” biological indicators used in soil health assessment. While pooling data collected by producer-groups is one of the most exciting new trends in soil health, standardizing methods to meet broad inventory goals could compromise indicator use for site or application-specific problem solving. Changes in our nation's research landscape are shifting responsibility for soil stewardship from national and state government backed entities to public-private partnerships. As a result, it is critical to ensure that the data needed to assess soil health are generated by reproducible methods selected through a transparent process, and that data are readily available for public and private sector use. Appropriate methods for engagement need to be applied by public-private research partnerships as they establish and expand coordinated research enterprises that can deliver fact-based interpretation of soil quality indicators within the type of normative soil health framework conceived by USDA over 20 years ago. We look to existing examples as we consider how to put soil health information into the hands of practitioners in a manner that protects soils' services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number109
JournalFrontiers in Environmental Science
Volume7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 16 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2019 Wander, Cihacek, Coyne, Drijber, Grossman, Gutknecht, Horwath, Jagadamma, Olk, Ruark, Snapp, Tiemann, Weil and Turco.

Keywords

  • frameworks
  • indicators
  • open source data
  • privatization
  • public-private partnerships (PPP)
  • soil health
  • soil quality
  • soil services

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Developments in Agricultural Soil Quality and Health: Reflections by the Research Committee on Soil Organic Matter Management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this