Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Development of a Core Outcome Domain Set for Facial Aging

  • Facial Aging Core Outcome Domain Set Study Group

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Currently, there are no standardized outcome domains or measures in clinical trials for facial aging. Heterogeneity in outcome domains and measurement instruments across clinical trials creates difficulty in directly comparing interventions, determining superior therapies, and developing high-quality meta-analyses. OBJECTIVE To develop a core outcome set (COS) of essential domains to be reported in clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of interventions for facial aging. EVIDENCE REVIEW PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL were searched from September 2005 to September 2015. An updated search of the same databases was performed from September 2015 to February 2026. Studies were included if (1) they were randomized clinical trial or controlled clinical trial in design, (2) they assessed the efficacy or safety of an intervention for facial aging, (3) they were published in English, and (4) they involved human participants. Complementary sources, including patient interviews, were used to capture further relevant outcomes. Two rounds of Delphi surveys, followed by consensus meetings, were used to identify outcome domains considered most important by both patient and physician stakeholders. FINDINGS The final COS consists of 6 outcome domains: (1) overall convenience of treatment; (2) time to return to normal work and social activity; (3) overall assessment of focused area of treatment (at the point in time when treatment is expected to provide peak benefit); (4) duration of treatment effect; (5) severity of persistent local or systemic adverse events, including pigmentary change, skin texture change, delayed healing, scarring, and serious adverse events; and (6) patient satisfaction with treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The 6 outcome domains identified through a Delphi consensus are recommended for reporting in future facial aging trials to ensure that outcomes that matter most to patients and clinicians are measured and that results are comparable across interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJAMA Dermatology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of a Core Outcome Domain Set for Facial Aging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this