TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a Core Outcome Domain Set for Facial Aging
AU - Facial Aging Core Outcome Domain Set Study Group
AU - Dirr, McKenzie A.
AU - Ahmed, Areeba
AU - Schlessinger, Daniel I.
AU - Lazaro-Camp, Vanessa
AU - Smith, Sabrina
AU - Gullapalli, Thanvi
AU - Dragovic, Doroteja
AU - Chang, Joycie
AU - Zhang, Elizabeth
AU - Alam, Murad
AU - Anvery, Noor
AU - Christensen, Rachel E.
AU - Ibrahim, Sarah A.
AU - Kang, Bianca Y.
AU - Wong, Clarissa
AU - Iyengar, Sanjana
AU - Yanes, Arianna F.
AU - Cotseones, Jill
AU - Ashchyan, Hovik J.
AU - Patel, Payal M.
AU - Sheikh, Umar A.
AU - Franklin, Matthew J.
AU - Hanna, Courtney C.
AU - Chiren, Sarah G.
AU - Schmitt, Jochen
AU - Furlan, Karina C.
AU - Alexiades, Macrene
AU - Alhusayen, Raed
AU - Alster, Tina S.
AU - Beer, Kenneth
AU - Bertucci, Vince
AU - Bloom, Jason D.
AU - Briceño, César A.
AU - Bucay, Vivian
AU - Butterwick, Kimberly J.
AU - Hugues, Cartier
AU - Casabona, Gabriela
AU - Connolly, Karen L.
AU - Cotofana, Sebastian
AU - Council, Martha Laurin
AU - Cox, Sue Ellen
AU - Darmanescu, Monica
AU - De Boulle, Koenraad
AU - Desai, Shraddha
AU - Donofrio, Lisa M.
AU - Dover, Jeffrey S.
AU - Draelos, Zoe
AU - Eisen, Daniel B.
AU - Sadick, Neil
AU - Maher, Ian A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - IMPORTANCE Currently, there are no standardized outcome domains or measures in clinical trials for facial aging. Heterogeneity in outcome domains and measurement instruments across clinical trials creates difficulty in directly comparing interventions, determining superior therapies, and developing high-quality meta-analyses. OBJECTIVE To develop a core outcome set (COS) of essential domains to be reported in clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of interventions for facial aging. EVIDENCE REVIEW PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL were searched from September 2005 to September 2015. An updated search of the same databases was performed from September 2015 to February 2026. Studies were included if (1) they were randomized clinical trial or controlled clinical trial in design, (2) they assessed the efficacy or safety of an intervention for facial aging, (3) they were published in English, and (4) they involved human participants. Complementary sources, including patient interviews, were used to capture further relevant outcomes. Two rounds of Delphi surveys, followed by consensus meetings, were used to identify outcome domains considered most important by both patient and physician stakeholders. FINDINGS The final COS consists of 6 outcome domains: (1) overall convenience of treatment; (2) time to return to normal work and social activity; (3) overall assessment of focused area of treatment (at the point in time when treatment is expected to provide peak benefit); (4) duration of treatment effect; (5) severity of persistent local or systemic adverse events, including pigmentary change, skin texture change, delayed healing, scarring, and serious adverse events; and (6) patient satisfaction with treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The 6 outcome domains identified through a Delphi consensus are recommended for reporting in future facial aging trials to ensure that outcomes that matter most to patients and clinicians are measured and that results are comparable across interventions.
AB - IMPORTANCE Currently, there are no standardized outcome domains or measures in clinical trials for facial aging. Heterogeneity in outcome domains and measurement instruments across clinical trials creates difficulty in directly comparing interventions, determining superior therapies, and developing high-quality meta-analyses. OBJECTIVE To develop a core outcome set (COS) of essential domains to be reported in clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of interventions for facial aging. EVIDENCE REVIEW PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL were searched from September 2005 to September 2015. An updated search of the same databases was performed from September 2015 to February 2026. Studies were included if (1) they were randomized clinical trial or controlled clinical trial in design, (2) they assessed the efficacy or safety of an intervention for facial aging, (3) they were published in English, and (4) they involved human participants. Complementary sources, including patient interviews, were used to capture further relevant outcomes. Two rounds of Delphi surveys, followed by consensus meetings, were used to identify outcome domains considered most important by both patient and physician stakeholders. FINDINGS The final COS consists of 6 outcome domains: (1) overall convenience of treatment; (2) time to return to normal work and social activity; (3) overall assessment of focused area of treatment (at the point in time when treatment is expected to provide peak benefit); (4) duration of treatment effect; (5) severity of persistent local or systemic adverse events, including pigmentary change, skin texture change, delayed healing, scarring, and serious adverse events; and (6) patient satisfaction with treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The 6 outcome domains identified through a Delphi consensus are recommended for reporting in future facial aging trials to ensure that outcomes that matter most to patients and clinicians are measured and that results are comparable across interventions.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105042664816
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105042664816#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.1697
DO - 10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.1697
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105042664816
SN - 2168-6068
JO - JAMA Dermatology
JF - JAMA Dermatology
ER -