Development geography and the third-world state

Jim Glassman, Abdi I Samatar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Soon after the third-world state was declared impotent, contradictory evidence pointing to the importance of state leadership in development in the Asian miracles came to the fore. This article, through a critical review of the literature, pushes this argument further and claims that geographers have much to contribute to the analysis of the state and its role in development. An appropriate framework for this kind of work is a marriage of radical political economy and certain strands of neo-Weberianism. We suggest that this conceptual union allows for broad theorizing of the capitalist state in the periphery while minding the institutional details of third-world states in particular regions and countries. This approach can help explain the differential performances of various third-world states within the confines of the world system. Thailand and Botswana are used as comparative cases to demonstrate the utility of this framework.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)164-198
Number of pages35
JournalProgress in Human Geography
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

Third World
geography
Botswana
marriage
political economy
leadership
Thailand
performance
evidence
world
literature
analysis

Cite this

Development geography and the third-world state. / Glassman, Jim; Samatar, Abdi I.

In: Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 21, No. 2, 01.01.1997, p. 164-198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c700b638790a40b38ff2128c1facea24,
title = "Development geography and the third-world state",
abstract = "Soon after the third-world state was declared impotent, contradictory evidence pointing to the importance of state leadership in development in the Asian miracles came to the fore. This article, through a critical review of the literature, pushes this argument further and claims that geographers have much to contribute to the analysis of the state and its role in development. An appropriate framework for this kind of work is a marriage of radical political economy and certain strands of neo-Weberianism. We suggest that this conceptual union allows for broad theorizing of the capitalist state in the periphery while minding the institutional details of third-world states in particular regions and countries. This approach can help explain the differential performances of various third-world states within the confines of the world system. Thailand and Botswana are used as comparative cases to demonstrate the utility of this framework.",
author = "Jim Glassman and Samatar, {Abdi I}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1191/030913297667309393",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "164--198",
journal = "Progress in Human Geography",
issn = "0309-1325",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development geography and the third-world state

AU - Glassman, Jim

AU - Samatar, Abdi I

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - Soon after the third-world state was declared impotent, contradictory evidence pointing to the importance of state leadership in development in the Asian miracles came to the fore. This article, through a critical review of the literature, pushes this argument further and claims that geographers have much to contribute to the analysis of the state and its role in development. An appropriate framework for this kind of work is a marriage of radical political economy and certain strands of neo-Weberianism. We suggest that this conceptual union allows for broad theorizing of the capitalist state in the periphery while minding the institutional details of third-world states in particular regions and countries. This approach can help explain the differential performances of various third-world states within the confines of the world system. Thailand and Botswana are used as comparative cases to demonstrate the utility of this framework.

AB - Soon after the third-world state was declared impotent, contradictory evidence pointing to the importance of state leadership in development in the Asian miracles came to the fore. This article, through a critical review of the literature, pushes this argument further and claims that geographers have much to contribute to the analysis of the state and its role in development. An appropriate framework for this kind of work is a marriage of radical political economy and certain strands of neo-Weberianism. We suggest that this conceptual union allows for broad theorizing of the capitalist state in the periphery while minding the institutional details of third-world states in particular regions and countries. This approach can help explain the differential performances of various third-world states within the confines of the world system. Thailand and Botswana are used as comparative cases to demonstrate the utility of this framework.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031456948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031456948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1191/030913297667309393

DO - 10.1191/030913297667309393

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031456948

VL - 21

SP - 164

EP - 198

JO - Progress in Human Geography

JF - Progress in Human Geography

SN - 0309-1325

IS - 2

ER -