Development and validation of a tool to assess the readiness of a clinical teaching site for interprofessional education (InSITE)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Interprofessional education within clinical teaching sites is a key part of training for pre-professional students. However, the necessary characteristics of these interprofessional clinical teaching sites is unclear. We developed a tool, the Interprofessional Education Site Readiness, or InSITE, tool, for individuals at a site to use as a self-assessment of the site’s current readiness for providing interprofessional education. The tool progressed through six stages of development, collecting evidence for validity and reliability, resulting in a final tool with 23 questions distributed across five domains. Data from 94 respondents from a variety of national sites were used for the item analysis showing acceptable item-to-total correlations. Internal reliability testing gave a Cronbach’s coefficient alpha of more than 0.70 for each group level comparison. Known groups validity testing provides strong evidence for its responsiveness in detecting differences in sites where IPE is implemented. The results of the testing lead us to conclude that the InSITE tool has acceptable psychometric properties. Additionally, we discovered that the process in which the InSITE tool was used demonstrated that it can facilitate learning in practice for the health professionals and can help make implicit, informal workplace learning and the hidden curriculum explicit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of interprofessional care
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Teaching
Education
Learning
Professional Practice
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Workplace
Curriculum
Students
Health
Surveys and Questionnaires
Self-Assessment

Keywords

  • Interprofessional education
  • assessment tool
  • collaborative practice
  • hidden curriculum
  • informal learning

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Cite this

@article{64a2b83a359f4974afa4fa78b6b56f8a,
title = "Development and validation of a tool to assess the readiness of a clinical teaching site for interprofessional education (InSITE)",
abstract = "Interprofessional education within clinical teaching sites is a key part of training for pre-professional students. However, the necessary characteristics of these interprofessional clinical teaching sites is unclear. We developed a tool, the Interprofessional Education Site Readiness, or InSITE, tool, for individuals at a site to use as a self-assessment of the site’s current readiness for providing interprofessional education. The tool progressed through six stages of development, collecting evidence for validity and reliability, resulting in a final tool with 23 questions distributed across five domains. Data from 94 respondents from a variety of national sites were used for the item analysis showing acceptable item-to-total correlations. Internal reliability testing gave a Cronbach’s coefficient alpha of more than 0.70 for each group level comparison. Known groups validity testing provides strong evidence for its responsiveness in detecting differences in sites where IPE is implemented. The results of the testing lead us to conclude that the InSITE tool has acceptable psychometric properties. Additionally, we discovered that the process in which the InSITE tool was used demonstrated that it can facilitate learning in practice for the health professionals and can help make implicit, informal workplace learning and the hidden curriculum explicit.",
keywords = "Interprofessional education, assessment tool, collaborative practice, hidden curriculum, informal learning",
author = "Sick, {Brian T} and Radosevich, {David M} and Pittenger, {Amy L} and Brandt, {Barbara F}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13561820.2019.1569600",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Interprofessional Care",
issn = "1356-1820",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and validation of a tool to assess the readiness of a clinical teaching site for interprofessional education (InSITE)

AU - Sick, Brian T

AU - Radosevich, David M

AU - Pittenger, Amy L

AU - Brandt, Barbara F

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Interprofessional education within clinical teaching sites is a key part of training for pre-professional students. However, the necessary characteristics of these interprofessional clinical teaching sites is unclear. We developed a tool, the Interprofessional Education Site Readiness, or InSITE, tool, for individuals at a site to use as a self-assessment of the site’s current readiness for providing interprofessional education. The tool progressed through six stages of development, collecting evidence for validity and reliability, resulting in a final tool with 23 questions distributed across five domains. Data from 94 respondents from a variety of national sites were used for the item analysis showing acceptable item-to-total correlations. Internal reliability testing gave a Cronbach’s coefficient alpha of more than 0.70 for each group level comparison. Known groups validity testing provides strong evidence for its responsiveness in detecting differences in sites where IPE is implemented. The results of the testing lead us to conclude that the InSITE tool has acceptable psychometric properties. Additionally, we discovered that the process in which the InSITE tool was used demonstrated that it can facilitate learning in practice for the health professionals and can help make implicit, informal workplace learning and the hidden curriculum explicit.

AB - Interprofessional education within clinical teaching sites is a key part of training for pre-professional students. However, the necessary characteristics of these interprofessional clinical teaching sites is unclear. We developed a tool, the Interprofessional Education Site Readiness, or InSITE, tool, for individuals at a site to use as a self-assessment of the site’s current readiness for providing interprofessional education. The tool progressed through six stages of development, collecting evidence for validity and reliability, resulting in a final tool with 23 questions distributed across five domains. Data from 94 respondents from a variety of national sites were used for the item analysis showing acceptable item-to-total correlations. Internal reliability testing gave a Cronbach’s coefficient alpha of more than 0.70 for each group level comparison. Known groups validity testing provides strong evidence for its responsiveness in detecting differences in sites where IPE is implemented. The results of the testing lead us to conclude that the InSITE tool has acceptable psychometric properties. Additionally, we discovered that the process in which the InSITE tool was used demonstrated that it can facilitate learning in practice for the health professionals and can help make implicit, informal workplace learning and the hidden curriculum explicit.

KW - Interprofessional education

KW - assessment tool

KW - collaborative practice

KW - hidden curriculum

KW - informal learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061430922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061430922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13561820.2019.1569600

DO - 10.1080/13561820.2019.1569600

M3 - Article

C2 - 30739518

AN - SCOPUS:85061430922

JO - Journal of Interprofessional Care

JF - Journal of Interprofessional Care

SN - 1356-1820

ER -