Development and Validation of a Novel Scoring System for Predicting Technical Success of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions the PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) Score

Georgios Christopoulos, David E. Kandzari, Robert W. Yeh, Farouc A. Jaffer, Dimitri Karmpaliotis, Michael R. Wyman, Khaldoon Alaswad, William Lombardi, J. Aaron Grantham, Jeffrey Moses, Georgios Christakopoulos, Muhammad Nauman J. Tarar, Bavana V. Rangan, Nicholas Lembo, Santiago Garcia, Daisha Cipher, Craig A. Thompson, Subhash Banerjee, Emmanouil S. Brilakis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

100 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives This study sought to develop a novel parsimonious score for predicting technical success of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed using the hybrid approach. Background Predicting technical success of CTO PCI can facilitate clinical decision making and procedural planning. Methods We analyzed clinical and angiographic parameters from 781 CTO PCIs included in PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) using a derivation and validation cohort (2:1 sampling ratio). Variables with strong association with technical success in multivariable analysis were assigned 1 point, and a 4-point score was developed from summing all points. The PROGRESS CTO score was subsequently compared with the J-CTO (Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusion Registry in Japan) score in the validation cohort. Results Technical success was 92.9%. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with technical success included proximal cap ambiguity (beta coefficient [b] = 0.88), moderate/severe tortuosity (b = 1.18), circumflex artery CTO (b = 0.99), and absence of "interventional" collaterals (b = 0.88). The resulting score demonstrated good calibration and discriminatory capacity in the derivation (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square = 2.633; p = 0.268, and receiver-operator characteristic [ROC] area = 0.778) and validation (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square = 5.333; p = 0.070, and ROC area = 0.720) subset. In the validation cohort, the PROGRESS CTO and J-CTO scores performed similarly in predicting technical success (ROC area 0.720 vs. 0.746, area under the curve difference = 0.026, 95% confidence interval = -0.093 to 0.144). Conclusions The PROGRESS CTO score is a novel useful tool for estimating technical success in CTO PCI performed using the hybrid approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 11 2016

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Registries
Calibration
Area Under Curve
Japan
Arteries
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • chronic total occlusion
  • percutaneous coronary intervention
  • scoring
  • technical success

Cite this

Development and Validation of a Novel Scoring System for Predicting Technical Success of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions the PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) Score. / Christopoulos, Georgios; Kandzari, David E.; Yeh, Robert W.; Jaffer, Farouc A.; Karmpaliotis, Dimitri; Wyman, Michael R.; Alaswad, Khaldoon; Lombardi, William; Grantham, J. Aaron; Moses, Jeffrey; Christakopoulos, Georgios; Tarar, Muhammad Nauman J.; Rangan, Bavana V.; Lembo, Nicholas; Garcia, Santiago; Cipher, Daisha; Thompson, Craig A.; Banerjee, Subhash; Brilakis, Emmanouil S.

In: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, Vol. 9, No. 1, 11.01.2016, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Christopoulos, G, Kandzari, DE, Yeh, RW, Jaffer, FA, Karmpaliotis, D, Wyman, MR, Alaswad, K, Lombardi, W, Grantham, JA, Moses, J, Christakopoulos, G, Tarar, MNJ, Rangan, BV, Lembo, N, Garcia, S, Cipher, D, Thompson, CA, Banerjee, S & Brilakis, ES 2016, 'Development and Validation of a Novel Scoring System for Predicting Technical Success of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions the PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) Score', JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.09.022
Christopoulos, Georgios ; Kandzari, David E. ; Yeh, Robert W. ; Jaffer, Farouc A. ; Karmpaliotis, Dimitri ; Wyman, Michael R. ; Alaswad, Khaldoon ; Lombardi, William ; Grantham, J. Aaron ; Moses, Jeffrey ; Christakopoulos, Georgios ; Tarar, Muhammad Nauman J. ; Rangan, Bavana V. ; Lembo, Nicholas ; Garcia, Santiago ; Cipher, Daisha ; Thompson, Craig A. ; Banerjee, Subhash ; Brilakis, Emmanouil S. / Development and Validation of a Novel Scoring System for Predicting Technical Success of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions the PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) Score. In: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2016 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 1-9.
@article{5392ee3350d348879ae5cd5183d20a51,
title = "Development and Validation of a Novel Scoring System for Predicting Technical Success of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions the PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) Score",
abstract = "Objectives This study sought to develop a novel parsimonious score for predicting technical success of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed using the hybrid approach. Background Predicting technical success of CTO PCI can facilitate clinical decision making and procedural planning. Methods We analyzed clinical and angiographic parameters from 781 CTO PCIs included in PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) using a derivation and validation cohort (2:1 sampling ratio). Variables with strong association with technical success in multivariable analysis were assigned 1 point, and a 4-point score was developed from summing all points. The PROGRESS CTO score was subsequently compared with the J-CTO (Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusion Registry in Japan) score in the validation cohort. Results Technical success was 92.9{\%}. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with technical success included proximal cap ambiguity (beta coefficient [b] = 0.88), moderate/severe tortuosity (b = 1.18), circumflex artery CTO (b = 0.99), and absence of {"}interventional{"} collaterals (b = 0.88). The resulting score demonstrated good calibration and discriminatory capacity in the derivation (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square = 2.633; p = 0.268, and receiver-operator characteristic [ROC] area = 0.778) and validation (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square = 5.333; p = 0.070, and ROC area = 0.720) subset. In the validation cohort, the PROGRESS CTO and J-CTO scores performed similarly in predicting technical success (ROC area 0.720 vs. 0.746, area under the curve difference = 0.026, 95{\%} confidence interval = -0.093 to 0.144). Conclusions The PROGRESS CTO score is a novel useful tool for estimating technical success in CTO PCI performed using the hybrid approach.",
keywords = "chronic total occlusion, percutaneous coronary intervention, scoring, technical success",
author = "Georgios Christopoulos and Kandzari, {David E.} and Yeh, {Robert W.} and Jaffer, {Farouc A.} and Dimitri Karmpaliotis and Wyman, {Michael R.} and Khaldoon Alaswad and William Lombardi and Grantham, {J. Aaron} and Jeffrey Moses and Georgios Christakopoulos and Tarar, {Muhammad Nauman J.} and Rangan, {Bavana V.} and Nicholas Lembo and Santiago Garcia and Daisha Cipher and Thompson, {Craig A.} and Subhash Banerjee and Brilakis, {Emmanouil S.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcin.2015.09.022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions",
issn = "1936-8798",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and Validation of a Novel Scoring System for Predicting Technical Success of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions the PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) Score

AU - Christopoulos, Georgios

AU - Kandzari, David E.

AU - Yeh, Robert W.

AU - Jaffer, Farouc A.

AU - Karmpaliotis, Dimitri

AU - Wyman, Michael R.

AU - Alaswad, Khaldoon

AU - Lombardi, William

AU - Grantham, J. Aaron

AU - Moses, Jeffrey

AU - Christakopoulos, Georgios

AU - Tarar, Muhammad Nauman J.

AU - Rangan, Bavana V.

AU - Lembo, Nicholas

AU - Garcia, Santiago

AU - Cipher, Daisha

AU - Thompson, Craig A.

AU - Banerjee, Subhash

AU - Brilakis, Emmanouil S.

PY - 2016/1/11

Y1 - 2016/1/11

N2 - Objectives This study sought to develop a novel parsimonious score for predicting technical success of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed using the hybrid approach. Background Predicting technical success of CTO PCI can facilitate clinical decision making and procedural planning. Methods We analyzed clinical and angiographic parameters from 781 CTO PCIs included in PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) using a derivation and validation cohort (2:1 sampling ratio). Variables with strong association with technical success in multivariable analysis were assigned 1 point, and a 4-point score was developed from summing all points. The PROGRESS CTO score was subsequently compared with the J-CTO (Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusion Registry in Japan) score in the validation cohort. Results Technical success was 92.9%. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with technical success included proximal cap ambiguity (beta coefficient [b] = 0.88), moderate/severe tortuosity (b = 1.18), circumflex artery CTO (b = 0.99), and absence of "interventional" collaterals (b = 0.88). The resulting score demonstrated good calibration and discriminatory capacity in the derivation (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square = 2.633; p = 0.268, and receiver-operator characteristic [ROC] area = 0.778) and validation (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square = 5.333; p = 0.070, and ROC area = 0.720) subset. In the validation cohort, the PROGRESS CTO and J-CTO scores performed similarly in predicting technical success (ROC area 0.720 vs. 0.746, area under the curve difference = 0.026, 95% confidence interval = -0.093 to 0.144). Conclusions The PROGRESS CTO score is a novel useful tool for estimating technical success in CTO PCI performed using the hybrid approach.

AB - Objectives This study sought to develop a novel parsimonious score for predicting technical success of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed using the hybrid approach. Background Predicting technical success of CTO PCI can facilitate clinical decision making and procedural planning. Methods We analyzed clinical and angiographic parameters from 781 CTO PCIs included in PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) using a derivation and validation cohort (2:1 sampling ratio). Variables with strong association with technical success in multivariable analysis were assigned 1 point, and a 4-point score was developed from summing all points. The PROGRESS CTO score was subsequently compared with the J-CTO (Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusion Registry in Japan) score in the validation cohort. Results Technical success was 92.9%. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with technical success included proximal cap ambiguity (beta coefficient [b] = 0.88), moderate/severe tortuosity (b = 1.18), circumflex artery CTO (b = 0.99), and absence of "interventional" collaterals (b = 0.88). The resulting score demonstrated good calibration and discriminatory capacity in the derivation (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square = 2.633; p = 0.268, and receiver-operator characteristic [ROC] area = 0.778) and validation (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square = 5.333; p = 0.070, and ROC area = 0.720) subset. In the validation cohort, the PROGRESS CTO and J-CTO scores performed similarly in predicting technical success (ROC area 0.720 vs. 0.746, area under the curve difference = 0.026, 95% confidence interval = -0.093 to 0.144). Conclusions The PROGRESS CTO score is a novel useful tool for estimating technical success in CTO PCI performed using the hybrid approach.

KW - chronic total occlusion

KW - percutaneous coronary intervention

KW - scoring

KW - technical success

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952948540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952948540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.09.022

DO - 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.09.022

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

SN - 1936-8798

IS - 1

ER -