Developing predictive systems models to address complexity and relevance for ecological risk assessment.

Valery E. Forbes, Peter Calow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations


Ecological risk assessments (ERAs) are not used as well as they could be in risk management. Part of the problem is that they often lack ecological relevance; that is, they fail to grasp necessary ecological complexities. Adding realism and complexity can be difficult and costly. We argue that predictive systems models (PSMs) can provide a way of capturing complexity and ecological relevance cost-effectively. However, addressing complexity and ecological relevance is only part of the problem. Ecological risk assessments often fail to meet the needs of risk managers by not providing assessments that relate to protection goals and by expressing risk in ratios that cannot be weighed against the costs of interventions. Once more, PSMs can be designed to provide outputs in terms of value-relevant effects that are modulated against exposure and that can provide a better basis for decision making than arbitrary ratios or threshold values. Recent developments in the modeling and its potential for implementation by risk assessors and risk managers are beginning to demonstrate how PSMs can be practically applied in risk assessment and the advantages that doing so could have.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e75-e80
JournalIntegrated environmental assessment and management
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jul 2013


Dive into the research topics of 'Developing predictive systems models to address complexity and relevance for ecological risk assessment.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this