Abstract
Objective To assess nonresponse bias in a mixed-mode general population health survey. Data Sources Secondary analysis of linked survey sample frame and administrative data, including demographic and health-related information. Study Design The survey was administered by mail with telephone follow-up to nonrespondents after two mailings. To determine whether an additional mail contact or mode switch reduced nonresponse bias, we compared all respondents (N = 3,437) to respondents from each mailing and telephone respondents to the sample frame (N = 6,716). Principal Findings Switching modes did not minimize the under-representation of younger people, nonwhites, those with congestive heart failure, high users of office-based services, and low-utilizers of the emergency room but did reduce the over-representation of older adults. Conclusions Multiple contact and mixed-mode surveys may increase response rates, but they do not necessarily reduce nonresponse bias.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1739-1754 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Health services research |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2012 |
Keywords
- Health survey methods
- mailed survey
- mixed-mode survey
- nonresponse bias
- telephone survey
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Deployment of a mixed-mode data collection strategy does not reduce nonresponse bias in a general population health survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS