Democratic contraction? Political consequences of felon disenfranchisement in the United States

Christopher Uggen, Jeff Manza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

269 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Universal suffrage is a cornerstone of democratic governance. As levels of criminal punishment have risen in the United States, however, an ever-larger number of citizens have lost the right to vote. The authors ask whether felon disenfranchisement constitutes a meaningful reversal of the extension of voting rights by considering its political impact. Data from legal sources, election studies, and inmate surveys are examined to consider two counterfactual conditions: (1) whether removing disenfranchisement restrictions alters the outcomes of past U.S. Senate and presidential elections, and (2) whether applying contemporary rates of disenfranchisement to prior elections affects their outcomes. Because felons are drawn disproportionately from the ranks of racial minorities and the poor, disenfranchisement laws tend to take more votes from Democratic than from Republican candidates. Analysis shows that felon disenfranchisement played a decisive role in U.S. Senate elections in recent years. Moreover, at least one Republican presidential victory would have been reversed if former felons had been allowed to vote, and at least one Democratic presidential victory would have been jeopardized had contemporary rates of disenfranchisement prevailed during that time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)777-803
Number of pages27
JournalAmerican Sociological Review
Volume67
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

senate
voter
election
poor law
right to vote
political impact
suffrage
election research
presidential election
voting
penalty
candidacy
minority
governance
citizen
time

Cite this

Democratic contraction? Political consequences of felon disenfranchisement in the United States. / Uggen, Christopher; Manza, Jeff.

In: American Sociological Review, Vol. 67, No. 6, 01.01.2002, p. 777-803.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{459fbc94bc004eabaf04f9c076a76770,
title = "Democratic contraction? Political consequences of felon disenfranchisement in the United States",
abstract = "Universal suffrage is a cornerstone of democratic governance. As levels of criminal punishment have risen in the United States, however, an ever-larger number of citizens have lost the right to vote. The authors ask whether felon disenfranchisement constitutes a meaningful reversal of the extension of voting rights by considering its political impact. Data from legal sources, election studies, and inmate surveys are examined to consider two counterfactual conditions: (1) whether removing disenfranchisement restrictions alters the outcomes of past U.S. Senate and presidential elections, and (2) whether applying contemporary rates of disenfranchisement to prior elections affects their outcomes. Because felons are drawn disproportionately from the ranks of racial minorities and the poor, disenfranchisement laws tend to take more votes from Democratic than from Republican candidates. Analysis shows that felon disenfranchisement played a decisive role in U.S. Senate elections in recent years. Moreover, at least one Republican presidential victory would have been reversed if former felons had been allowed to vote, and at least one Democratic presidential victory would have been jeopardized had contemporary rates of disenfranchisement prevailed during that time.",
author = "Christopher Uggen and Jeff Manza",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/3088970",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "777--803",
journal = "American Sociological Review",
issn = "0003-1224",
publisher = "American Sociological Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Democratic contraction? Political consequences of felon disenfranchisement in the United States

AU - Uggen, Christopher

AU - Manza, Jeff

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Universal suffrage is a cornerstone of democratic governance. As levels of criminal punishment have risen in the United States, however, an ever-larger number of citizens have lost the right to vote. The authors ask whether felon disenfranchisement constitutes a meaningful reversal of the extension of voting rights by considering its political impact. Data from legal sources, election studies, and inmate surveys are examined to consider two counterfactual conditions: (1) whether removing disenfranchisement restrictions alters the outcomes of past U.S. Senate and presidential elections, and (2) whether applying contemporary rates of disenfranchisement to prior elections affects their outcomes. Because felons are drawn disproportionately from the ranks of racial minorities and the poor, disenfranchisement laws tend to take more votes from Democratic than from Republican candidates. Analysis shows that felon disenfranchisement played a decisive role in U.S. Senate elections in recent years. Moreover, at least one Republican presidential victory would have been reversed if former felons had been allowed to vote, and at least one Democratic presidential victory would have been jeopardized had contemporary rates of disenfranchisement prevailed during that time.

AB - Universal suffrage is a cornerstone of democratic governance. As levels of criminal punishment have risen in the United States, however, an ever-larger number of citizens have lost the right to vote. The authors ask whether felon disenfranchisement constitutes a meaningful reversal of the extension of voting rights by considering its political impact. Data from legal sources, election studies, and inmate surveys are examined to consider two counterfactual conditions: (1) whether removing disenfranchisement restrictions alters the outcomes of past U.S. Senate and presidential elections, and (2) whether applying contemporary rates of disenfranchisement to prior elections affects their outcomes. Because felons are drawn disproportionately from the ranks of racial minorities and the poor, disenfranchisement laws tend to take more votes from Democratic than from Republican candidates. Analysis shows that felon disenfranchisement played a decisive role in U.S. Senate elections in recent years. Moreover, at least one Republican presidential victory would have been reversed if former felons had been allowed to vote, and at least one Democratic presidential victory would have been jeopardized had contemporary rates of disenfranchisement prevailed during that time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036929738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036929738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/3088970

DO - 10.2307/3088970

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 777

EP - 803

JO - American Sociological Review

JF - American Sociological Review

SN - 0003-1224

IS - 6

ER -