TY - JOUR
T1 - Delayed pain decrease following M1 tDCS in spinal cord injury
T2 - A randomized controlled clinical trial
AU - Thibaut, Aurore
AU - Carvalho, Sandra
AU - Morse, Leslie R.
AU - Zafonte, Ross
AU - Fregni, Felipe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2017/9/29
Y1 - 2017/9/29
N2 - Despite some encouraging findings for the treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) directed to the primary motor cortex (M1) has faced some mixed results. Prior to translating this technology to clinical care, consistent results and durable effects need to be found. We, therefore, aimed to assess the direct and long-term effects of tDCS on pain following SCI. We performed a two-phase randomized sham-controlled clinical trial where patients received 5 days of tDCS followed by a 3-month follow-up period (Phase I); then, Phase II consisted of 10 days of tDCS with an 8-week follow-up period. We assessed the level of pain with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients' quality of life and life satisfaction were also evaluated. 33 patients were enrolled in Phase I and 9 in Phase II. We observed a treatment effect at 1-week follow-up for Phase I and at 4-week follow-up for Phase II. The overall level of pain was significantly lower for the active group, as compared to sham, in Phase II. Our exploratory study shows that tDCS does seem to be a promising tool to manage pain in patients with SCI and repeated stimulation sessions are needed to induce long-lasting effects. Based on our protocol, it appears that adding a second treatment period could induce long-lasting effects. Clinicaltrials.gov identification number: NCT01599767
AB - Despite some encouraging findings for the treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) directed to the primary motor cortex (M1) has faced some mixed results. Prior to translating this technology to clinical care, consistent results and durable effects need to be found. We, therefore, aimed to assess the direct and long-term effects of tDCS on pain following SCI. We performed a two-phase randomized sham-controlled clinical trial where patients received 5 days of tDCS followed by a 3-month follow-up period (Phase I); then, Phase II consisted of 10 days of tDCS with an 8-week follow-up period. We assessed the level of pain with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients' quality of life and life satisfaction were also evaluated. 33 patients were enrolled in Phase I and 9 in Phase II. We observed a treatment effect at 1-week follow-up for Phase I and at 4-week follow-up for Phase II. The overall level of pain was significantly lower for the active group, as compared to sham, in Phase II. Our exploratory study shows that tDCS does seem to be a promising tool to manage pain in patients with SCI and repeated stimulation sessions are needed to induce long-lasting effects. Based on our protocol, it appears that adding a second treatment period could induce long-lasting effects. Clinicaltrials.gov identification number: NCT01599767
KW - Central sensitization
KW - Neuromodulation
KW - Pain
KW - Spinal cord injury
KW - Transcranial direct current stimulation
KW - Visual analogue scale
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027838940&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027838940&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.08.024
DO - 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.08.024
M3 - Article
C2 - 28822837
AN - SCOPUS:85027838940
SN - 0304-3940
VL - 658
SP - 19
EP - 26
JO - Neuroscience Letters
JF - Neuroscience Letters
ER -