Defining Poverty in Terms of Time and Income

Jose Pacas, Sarah M Flood, Misty L Heggeness

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Understanding poverty in terms of time use is not a new phenomenon. A 1977 article by Vickery theorizes a generalized definition of poverty using both income and time dimensions. She uses time diary data to identify families who are income poor, time poor, and both and highlights the importance of a time dimension to poverty, particularly as it relates to different household configurations. Under her generalized definition of poverty,"...the 1973 poverty population would have increased the number of poor female-headed families with children by 14 percent and increased the proportion of all families in poverty from .008 to .093 (35)." This paper uses the American Time Use Survey (ATUS-X) and the Current Population Survey (CPS) Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC) from 2003 to 2011 to update Vickery's analysis. We estimate poverty rates from 2003-2011 by income, time, and a combination of both for diverse household configurations. We also estimate the effect of household configuration on changes to the definition of poverty, controlling for a variety of socio-demographic factors such as age, race, and education.
Original languageEnglish (US)
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Income
Poverty
Household
Proportion
Economics
Current population survey
Diary
Education
Demographic factors

Cite this

Pacas, J., Flood, S. M., & Heggeness, M. L. (2013). Defining Poverty in Terms of Time and Income.

Defining Poverty in Terms of Time and Income. / Pacas, Jose; Flood, Sarah M; Heggeness, Misty L.

2013.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

@conference{75931614488341578a411b7f6a5043ba,
title = "Defining Poverty in Terms of Time and Income",
abstract = "Understanding poverty in terms of time use is not a new phenomenon. A 1977 article by Vickery theorizes a generalized definition of poverty using both income and time dimensions. She uses time diary data to identify families who are income poor, time poor, and both and highlights the importance of a time dimension to poverty, particularly as it relates to different household configurations. Under her generalized definition of poverty,{"}...the 1973 poverty population would have increased the number of poor female-headed families with children by 14 percent and increased the proportion of all families in poverty from .008 to .093 (35).{"} This paper uses the American Time Use Survey (ATUS-X) and the Current Population Survey (CPS) Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC) from 2003 to 2011 to update Vickery's analysis. We estimate poverty rates from 2003-2011 by income, time, and a combination of both for diverse household configurations. We also estimate the effect of household configuration on changes to the definition of poverty, controlling for a variety of socio-demographic factors such as age, race, and education.",
author = "Jose Pacas and Flood, {Sarah M} and Heggeness, {Misty L}",
year = "2013",
language = "English (US)",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Defining Poverty in Terms of Time and Income

AU - Pacas, Jose

AU - Flood, Sarah M

AU - Heggeness, Misty L

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Understanding poverty in terms of time use is not a new phenomenon. A 1977 article by Vickery theorizes a generalized definition of poverty using both income and time dimensions. She uses time diary data to identify families who are income poor, time poor, and both and highlights the importance of a time dimension to poverty, particularly as it relates to different household configurations. Under her generalized definition of poverty,"...the 1973 poverty population would have increased the number of poor female-headed families with children by 14 percent and increased the proportion of all families in poverty from .008 to .093 (35)." This paper uses the American Time Use Survey (ATUS-X) and the Current Population Survey (CPS) Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC) from 2003 to 2011 to update Vickery's analysis. We estimate poverty rates from 2003-2011 by income, time, and a combination of both for diverse household configurations. We also estimate the effect of household configuration on changes to the definition of poverty, controlling for a variety of socio-demographic factors such as age, race, and education.

AB - Understanding poverty in terms of time use is not a new phenomenon. A 1977 article by Vickery theorizes a generalized definition of poverty using both income and time dimensions. She uses time diary data to identify families who are income poor, time poor, and both and highlights the importance of a time dimension to poverty, particularly as it relates to different household configurations. Under her generalized definition of poverty,"...the 1973 poverty population would have increased the number of poor female-headed families with children by 14 percent and increased the proportion of all families in poverty from .008 to .093 (35)." This paper uses the American Time Use Survey (ATUS-X) and the Current Population Survey (CPS) Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC) from 2003 to 2011 to update Vickery's analysis. We estimate poverty rates from 2003-2011 by income, time, and a combination of both for diverse household configurations. We also estimate the effect of household configuration on changes to the definition of poverty, controlling for a variety of socio-demographic factors such as age, race, and education.

M3 - Paper

ER -