Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Children with chronic critical illness (CCI) are hypothesized to be a high-risk patient population with persistent multiple organ dysfunction and functional morbidities resulting in recurrent or prolonged critical care; however, it is unclear how CCI should be defined. The aim of this scoping review was to evaluate the existing literature for case definitions of pediatric CCI and case definitions of prolonged PICU admission and to explore the methodologies used to derive these definitions. DATA SOURCES: Four electronic databases (Ovid Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science) from inception to March 3, 2021. STUDY SELECTION: We included studies that provided a specific case definition for CCI or prolonged PICU admission. Crowdsourcing was used to screen citations independently and in duplicate. A machine-learning algorithm was developed and validated using 6,284 citations assessed in duplicate by trained crowd reviewers. A hybrid of crowdsourcing and machine-learning methods was used to complete the remaining citation screening. DATA EXTRACTION: We extracted details of case definitions, study demographics, participant characteristics, and outcomes assessed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Sixty-seven studies were included. Twelve studies (18%) provided a definition for CCI that included concepts of PICU length of stay (n = 12), medical complexity or chronic conditions (n = 9), recurrent admissions (n = 9), technology dependence (n = 5), and uncertain prognosis (n = 1). Definitions were commonly referenced from another source (n = 6) or opinion-based (n = 5). The remaining 55 studies (82%) provided a definition for prolonged PICU admission, most frequently greater than or equal to 14 (n = 11) or greater than or equal to 28 days (n = 10). Most of these definitions were derived by investigator opinion (n = 24) or statistical method (n = 18). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric CCI has been variably defined with regard to the concepts of patient complexity and chronicity of critical illness. A consensus definition is needed to advance this emerging and important area of pediatric critical care research.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | E91-E103 |
Journal | Pediatric Critical Care Medicine |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 1 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Dr. Zorko was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Canada Graduate Scholarship—Master’s Award. Dr. McNally disclosed that the code for the website used to crowdsource the systematic review is owned by a company called insightscope and that he worked with Algonquin College to develop the code and is the president of insightscope. Dr. Perry’s institution received funding from the National Institutes of Health and the American Association of Critical Care Nurses. Dr. Choong’s institution received funding from Alternative Funding Plan Innovation Fund Research Grant; she received funding from McMaster University. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Keywords
- chronic critical illness
- chronic disease
- critical care
- intensive care units
- pediatrics