Decline in coronary heart disease mortality. Old questions and new facts

Richard F. Gillum, Aaron R. Folsom, Henry Blackburn

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

50 Scopus citations

Abstract

By 1979, mortality rates for coronary heart disease had declined for 14 consecutive years in the United States. Preliminary data indicate a continued decline. This review of reports published in the last five years documents the consistency of most data with the following hypotheses: (1) Reductions in population levels of hypertension and cigarette smoking have contributed to the decline in mortality from coronary heart disease. (2) Improved medical care for acute myocardial infarction has also contributed to the decline. Data are lacking to specify the contributions of changes in other risk factors, emergency medical services, medical care of chronic coronary heart disease, or other changes in the physical and social environment. Long-term, simultaneous surveillance of mortality, morbidity, medical care, and risk factors should be supported in five to 10 centers around the United States.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1055-1065
Number of pages11
JournalThe American Journal of Medicine
Volume76
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1984
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
From the Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, and the Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. This work was supported by National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Research Grant 1ROl HL23727, Research Career Development Award lK04 HL00329 (Dr. Gillum), and National Research Service Award 5T32HL07036 (Dr. Folsom). Requests for reprints should be addressed to Dr. Richard F. Gillum, Division of Epidemiology, 611 Beacon Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455. Manuscript accepted January 11, 1984.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Decline in coronary heart disease mortality. Old questions and new facts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this