Data structures for range-aggregate extent queries

Prosenjit Gupta, Ravi Janardan, Yokesh Kumar, Michiel Smid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

A fundamental and well-studied problem in computational geometry is range searching, where the goal is to preprocess a set, S, of geometric objects (e.g., points in the plane) so that the subset S′⊆S that is contained in a query range (e.g., an axes-parallel rectangle) can be reported efficiently. However, in many situations, what is of interest is to generate a more informative "summary" of the output, obtained by applying a suitable aggregation function on S′. Examples of such aggregation functions include count, sum, min, max, mean, median, mode, and top-k that are usually computed on a set of weights defined suitably on the objects. Such range-aggregate query problems have been the subject of much recent research in both the database and the computational geometry communities. In this paper, we further generalize this line of work by considering aggregation functions on point-sets that measure the extent or "spread" of the objects in the retrieved set S′. The functions considered here include closest pair, diameter, and width. The challenge here is that these aggregation functions (unlike, say, count) are not efficiently decomposable in the sense that the answer to S′ cannot be inferred easily from answers to subsets that induce a partition of S′. Nevertheless, we have been able to obtain space- and query-time-efficient solutions to several such problems including: closest pair queries with axes-parallel rectangles on point sets in the plane and on random point-sets in Rd (d≥2), closest pair queries with disks on random point-sets in the plane, diameter queries on point-sets in the plane, and guaranteed-quality approximations for diameter and width queries in the plane. Our results are based on a combination of geometric techniques, including multilevel range trees, Voronoi Diagrams, Euclidean Minimum Spanning Trees, sparse representations of candidate outputs, and proofs of (expected) upper bounds on the sizes of such representations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)329-347
Number of pages19
JournalComputational Geometry: Theory and Applications
Volume47
Issue number2 PART C
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Closest pair
  • Computational geometry
  • Data structures
  • Diameter
  • Width

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Data structures for range-aggregate extent queries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this