Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Data on prior pesticide use collected from self- and proxy respondents

  • Rebecca A. Johnson
  • , Jack S. Mandel
  • , Robert W. Gibson
  • , Jeffrey H. Mandel
  • , Alan P. Bender
  • , Paul D. Gunderson
  • , Colleen M. Renier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Proxy respondents have often been used in case-control studies of cancer and pesticides. To evaluate the effect of exposure misclassification, we compared data collected during 1981–1983 from participants interviewed for a case-control study of leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with data collected during 1990–1991 from proxy respondents for participants who died or became incompetent since the initial interview (328 self-proxy pairs). As questions increased in detail, agreement percentages decreased. Agreement percentages were highest for demographic and general farming information (averages = 88–90%) and lowest for specific pesticide use (averages = 68–74%). Generally, odds ratios calculated from proxy respondent data were less than those from self-respondent data; however, several exceptions occurred. The findings indicate that pesticide data provided by proxy respondents will not necessarily result in the same estimate of risk and/or lead to the same conclusions as data provided by self-respondents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)157-164
Number of pages8
JournalEpidemiology
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1993

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Data collection
  • Epidemiologic methods
  • Interviews
  • Neoplasms
  • Pesticides
  • Proxy respondents

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Data on prior pesticide use collected from self- and proxy respondents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this