Abstract
Proxy respondents have often been used in case-control studies of cancer and pesticides. To evaluate the effect of exposure misclassification, we compared data collected during 1981–1983 from participants interviewed for a case-control study of leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with data collected during 1990–1991 from proxy respondents for participants who died or became incompetent since the initial interview (328 self-proxy pairs). As questions increased in detail, agreement percentages decreased. Agreement percentages were highest for demographic and general farming information (averages = 88–90%) and lowest for specific pesticide use (averages = 68–74%). Generally, odds ratios calculated from proxy respondent data were less than those from self-respondent data; however, several exceptions occurred. The findings indicate that pesticide data provided by proxy respondents will not necessarily result in the same estimate of risk and/or lead to the same conclusions as data provided by self-respondents.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 157-164 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Epidemiology |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1993 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Data collection
- Epidemiologic methods
- Interviews
- Neoplasms
- Pesticides
- Proxy respondents
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Data on prior pesticide use collected from self- and proxy respondents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS