TY - JOUR
T1 - Daily left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for major depressive disorder
T2 - A sham-controlled randomized trial
AU - George, Mark S.
AU - Lisanby, Sarah H.
AU - Avery, David
AU - McDonald, William M.
AU - Durkalski, Valerie
AU - Pavlicova, Martina
AU - Anderson, Berry
AU - Nahas, Ziad
AU - Bulow, Peter
AU - Zarkowski, Paul
AU - Holtzheimer, Paul E.
AU - Schwartz, Theresa
AU - Sackeim, Harold A.
PY - 2010/5
Y1 - 2010/5
N2 - Context: Daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been studied as a potential treatment for depression, but previous work had mixed outcomes and did not adequately mask sham conditions. Objective: To test whether daily left prefrontal rTMS safely and effectively treats major depressive disorder. Design: Prospective, multisite, randomized, active shamcontrolled (1:1 randomization), duration-adaptive design with 3 weeks of daily weekday treatment (fixeddose phase) followed by continued blinded treatment for up to another 3 weeks in improvers. Setting: Four US university hospital clinics. Patients: Approximately 860 outpatients were screened, yielding 199 antidepressant drug-free patients with unipolar nonpsychotic major depressive disorder. Intervention: We delivered rTMS to the left prefrontal cortex at 120% motor threshold (10 Hz, 4-second train duration, and 26-second intertrain interval) for 37.5 minutes (3000 pulses per session) using a figure-eight solidcore coil. Sham rTMS used a similar coil with a metal insert blocking the magnetic field and scalp electrodes that delivered matched somatosensory sensations. Main Outcome Measure: In the intention-to-treat sample (n=190), remission rates were compared for the 2 treatment arms using logistic regression and controlling for site, treatment resistance, age, and duration of the current depressive episode. Results: Patients, treaters, and raters were effectively masked. Minimal adverse effects did not differ by treatment arm, with an 88% retention rate (90% sham and 86% active). Primary efficacy analysis revealed a significant effect of treatment on the proportion of remitters (14.1% active rTMS and 5.1% sham) (P=.02). The odds of attaining remission were 4.2 times greater with active rTMS than with sham (95% confidence interval, 1.32-13.24). The number needed to treat was 12. Most remitters had low antidepressant treatment resistance. Almost 30% of patients remitted in the open-label follow-up (30.2% originally active and 29.6% sham). Conclusion: Daily left prefrontal rTMS as monotherapy produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful antidepressant therapeutic effects greater than sham. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00149838.
AB - Context: Daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been studied as a potential treatment for depression, but previous work had mixed outcomes and did not adequately mask sham conditions. Objective: To test whether daily left prefrontal rTMS safely and effectively treats major depressive disorder. Design: Prospective, multisite, randomized, active shamcontrolled (1:1 randomization), duration-adaptive design with 3 weeks of daily weekday treatment (fixeddose phase) followed by continued blinded treatment for up to another 3 weeks in improvers. Setting: Four US university hospital clinics. Patients: Approximately 860 outpatients were screened, yielding 199 antidepressant drug-free patients with unipolar nonpsychotic major depressive disorder. Intervention: We delivered rTMS to the left prefrontal cortex at 120% motor threshold (10 Hz, 4-second train duration, and 26-second intertrain interval) for 37.5 minutes (3000 pulses per session) using a figure-eight solidcore coil. Sham rTMS used a similar coil with a metal insert blocking the magnetic field and scalp electrodes that delivered matched somatosensory sensations. Main Outcome Measure: In the intention-to-treat sample (n=190), remission rates were compared for the 2 treatment arms using logistic regression and controlling for site, treatment resistance, age, and duration of the current depressive episode. Results: Patients, treaters, and raters were effectively masked. Minimal adverse effects did not differ by treatment arm, with an 88% retention rate (90% sham and 86% active). Primary efficacy analysis revealed a significant effect of treatment on the proportion of remitters (14.1% active rTMS and 5.1% sham) (P=.02). The odds of attaining remission were 4.2 times greater with active rTMS than with sham (95% confidence interval, 1.32-13.24). The number needed to treat was 12. Most remitters had low antidepressant treatment resistance. Almost 30% of patients remitted in the open-label follow-up (30.2% originally active and 29.6% sham). Conclusion: Daily left prefrontal rTMS as monotherapy produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful antidepressant therapeutic effects greater than sham. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00149838.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951791209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951791209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.46
DO - 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.46
M3 - Article
C2 - 20439832
AN - SCOPUS:77951791209
SN - 0003-990X
VL - 67
SP - 507
EP - 516
JO - Archives of General Psychiatry
JF - Archives of General Psychiatry
IS - 5
ER -