Curriculum review and revision at the University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations


Curriculum review is an essential part of ongoing curriculum development, and is a mandate of the American Veterinary Medical Association Council on Education (AVMA COE), the accrediting body of all North American schools and colleges of veterinary medicine. This article describes the steps in curriculum review undertaken by the University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine (UMN CVM) in response to this mandate from the COE and to a recommendation from a recent collegiate review that was part of a larger university-level strategic planning effort. The challenges of reviewing and revising the curriculum within a short time frame were met by appointing a dedicated curriculum review board and by engaging students and faculty groups, both as focus groups and as specific faculty work sections within disciplines. Faculty voting on the process was very valuable as it permitted the curriculum review board and faculty groups to move ahead knowing there was a process in place for reassessment if most faculty did not agree with recommendations. Consistent support from the dean of the college and other administrators was vital in helping maintain momentum for curriculum review.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)459-470
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of veterinary medical education
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 AAVMC.


  • Accreditation
  • Competency/competencies
  • Curriculum
  • Curriculum review


Dive into the research topics of 'Curriculum review and revision at the University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this