Curriculum review and revision at the University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Curriculum review is an essential part of ongoing curriculum development, and is a mandate of the American Veterinary Medical Association Council on Education (AVMA COE), the accrediting body of all North American schools and colleges of veterinary medicine. This article describes the steps in curriculum review undertaken by the University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine (UMN CVM) in response to this mandate from the COE and to a recommendation from a recent collegiate review that was part of a larger university-level strategic planning effort. The challenges of reviewing and revising the curriculum within a short time frame were met by appointing a dedicated curriculum review board and by engaging students and faculty groups, both as focus groups and as specific faculty work sections within disciplines. Faculty voting on the process was very valuable as it permitted the curriculum review board and faculty groups to move ahead knowing there was a process in place for reassessment if most faculty did not agree with recommendations. Consistent support from the dean of the college and other administrators was vital in helping maintain momentum for curriculum review.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)459-470
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of veterinary medical education
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

veterinary medicine
Veterinary Medicine
curriculum
Curriculum
medical association
Group
curriculum development
strategic planning
focus groups
momentum
American Medical Association
Politics
voting
Focus Groups
Administrative Personnel
education
students
planning
Students
university

Keywords

  • Accreditation
  • Competency/competencies
  • Curriculum
  • Curriculum review

Cite this

@article{3c3bea65c02f4a129852ffcfd5565635,
title = "Curriculum review and revision at the University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine",
abstract = "Curriculum review is an essential part of ongoing curriculum development, and is a mandate of the American Veterinary Medical Association Council on Education (AVMA COE), the accrediting body of all North American schools and colleges of veterinary medicine. This article describes the steps in curriculum review undertaken by the University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine (UMN CVM) in response to this mandate from the COE and to a recommendation from a recent collegiate review that was part of a larger university-level strategic planning effort. The challenges of reviewing and revising the curriculum within a short time frame were met by appointing a dedicated curriculum review board and by engaging students and faculty groups, both as focus groups and as specific faculty work sections within disciplines. Faculty voting on the process was very valuable as it permitted the curriculum review board and faculty groups to move ahead knowing there was a process in place for reassessment if most faculty did not agree with recommendations. Consistent support from the dean of the college and other administrators was vital in helping maintain momentum for curriculum review.",
keywords = "Accreditation, Competency/competencies, Curriculum, Curriculum review",
author = "{Root Kustritz}, {Margaret V} and Molgaard, {Laura K} and Erin Malone",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3138/jvme.0217-029R",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "459--470",
journal = "Journal of Veterinary Medical Education",
issn = "0748-321X",
publisher = "University of Toronto Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Curriculum review and revision at the University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine

AU - Root Kustritz, Margaret V

AU - Molgaard, Laura K

AU - Malone, Erin

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Curriculum review is an essential part of ongoing curriculum development, and is a mandate of the American Veterinary Medical Association Council on Education (AVMA COE), the accrediting body of all North American schools and colleges of veterinary medicine. This article describes the steps in curriculum review undertaken by the University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine (UMN CVM) in response to this mandate from the COE and to a recommendation from a recent collegiate review that was part of a larger university-level strategic planning effort. The challenges of reviewing and revising the curriculum within a short time frame were met by appointing a dedicated curriculum review board and by engaging students and faculty groups, both as focus groups and as specific faculty work sections within disciplines. Faculty voting on the process was very valuable as it permitted the curriculum review board and faculty groups to move ahead knowing there was a process in place for reassessment if most faculty did not agree with recommendations. Consistent support from the dean of the college and other administrators was vital in helping maintain momentum for curriculum review.

AB - Curriculum review is an essential part of ongoing curriculum development, and is a mandate of the American Veterinary Medical Association Council on Education (AVMA COE), the accrediting body of all North American schools and colleges of veterinary medicine. This article describes the steps in curriculum review undertaken by the University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine (UMN CVM) in response to this mandate from the COE and to a recommendation from a recent collegiate review that was part of a larger university-level strategic planning effort. The challenges of reviewing and revising the curriculum within a short time frame were met by appointing a dedicated curriculum review board and by engaging students and faculty groups, both as focus groups and as specific faculty work sections within disciplines. Faculty voting on the process was very valuable as it permitted the curriculum review board and faculty groups to move ahead knowing there was a process in place for reassessment if most faculty did not agree with recommendations. Consistent support from the dean of the college and other administrators was vital in helping maintain momentum for curriculum review.

KW - Accreditation

KW - Competency/competencies

KW - Curriculum

KW - Curriculum review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030330161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030330161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3138/jvme.0217-029R

DO - 10.3138/jvme.0217-029R

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28876985

AN - SCOPUS:85030330161

VL - 44

SP - 459

EP - 470

JO - Journal of Veterinary Medical Education

JF - Journal of Veterinary Medical Education

SN - 0748-321X

IS - 3

ER -