Curriculum based measurement of reading: Consistency and validity across best, fastest, and question reading conditions

Theodore J Christ, Mary Jane White, Scott P. Ardoin, Tanya L. Eckert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Curriculum based measurement of reading (CBM-R) is frequently used to screen and monitor progress. It is not clear whether students engage in speed reading during standard CBM-R administrations and whether CBM-R outcomes retain high criterion-related validity in such conditions. This study examined the reading performance of 239 second- to fifth-grade students with standard and modified CBM-R task demands. Students were instructed to do their best reading, fast accurate reading, or read with comprehension. Reading rate and comprehension performance was compared and evaluated along with criterion validity with the Gates MacGinitie Reading Comprehension Test. A repeated measures analysis of variance and test of simple effects were used to analyze performance within each grade. Statistically significant differences in reading rate (p <.05) were observed between the best and fastest reading conditions in all grades; differences were observed between best and comprehension conditions in only fourth grade. Criterion-related validity was moderately robust in all grades for all conditions (>0.60). The comprehension task did not improve the incremental validity when used with CBM-R. Students do not appear to engage in speed reading during standardized CBM-R administrations. Implications for practice and future research are discussed within the context of screening and progress monitoring respectively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)415-436
Number of pages22
JournalSchool Psychology Review
Volume42
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Reading
curriculum
comprehension
Students
student
performance
analysis of variance
Analysis of Variance
monitoring

Cite this

Curriculum based measurement of reading : Consistency and validity across best, fastest, and question reading conditions. / Christ, Theodore J; White, Mary Jane; Ardoin, Scott P.; Eckert, Tanya L.

In: School Psychology Review, Vol. 42, No. 4, 01.12.2013, p. 415-436.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{81bd544010674f16b7d26c95165a96c7,
title = "Curriculum based measurement of reading: Consistency and validity across best, fastest, and question reading conditions",
abstract = "Curriculum based measurement of reading (CBM-R) is frequently used to screen and monitor progress. It is not clear whether students engage in speed reading during standard CBM-R administrations and whether CBM-R outcomes retain high criterion-related validity in such conditions. This study examined the reading performance of 239 second- to fifth-grade students with standard and modified CBM-R task demands. Students were instructed to do their best reading, fast accurate reading, or read with comprehension. Reading rate and comprehension performance was compared and evaluated along with criterion validity with the Gates MacGinitie Reading Comprehension Test. A repeated measures analysis of variance and test of simple effects were used to analyze performance within each grade. Statistically significant differences in reading rate (p <.05) were observed between the best and fastest reading conditions in all grades; differences were observed between best and comprehension conditions in only fourth grade. Criterion-related validity was moderately robust in all grades for all conditions (>0.60). The comprehension task did not improve the incremental validity when used with CBM-R. Students do not appear to engage in speed reading during standardized CBM-R administrations. Implications for practice and future research are discussed within the context of screening and progress monitoring respectively.",
author = "Christ, {Theodore J} and White, {Mary Jane} and Ardoin, {Scott P.} and Eckert, {Tanya L.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "415--436",
journal = "School Psychology Review",
issn = "0279-6015",
publisher = "National Association of School Psychologists",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Curriculum based measurement of reading

T2 - Consistency and validity across best, fastest, and question reading conditions

AU - Christ, Theodore J

AU - White, Mary Jane

AU - Ardoin, Scott P.

AU - Eckert, Tanya L.

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - Curriculum based measurement of reading (CBM-R) is frequently used to screen and monitor progress. It is not clear whether students engage in speed reading during standard CBM-R administrations and whether CBM-R outcomes retain high criterion-related validity in such conditions. This study examined the reading performance of 239 second- to fifth-grade students with standard and modified CBM-R task demands. Students were instructed to do their best reading, fast accurate reading, or read with comprehension. Reading rate and comprehension performance was compared and evaluated along with criterion validity with the Gates MacGinitie Reading Comprehension Test. A repeated measures analysis of variance and test of simple effects were used to analyze performance within each grade. Statistically significant differences in reading rate (p <.05) were observed between the best and fastest reading conditions in all grades; differences were observed between best and comprehension conditions in only fourth grade. Criterion-related validity was moderately robust in all grades for all conditions (>0.60). The comprehension task did not improve the incremental validity when used with CBM-R. Students do not appear to engage in speed reading during standardized CBM-R administrations. Implications for practice and future research are discussed within the context of screening and progress monitoring respectively.

AB - Curriculum based measurement of reading (CBM-R) is frequently used to screen and monitor progress. It is not clear whether students engage in speed reading during standard CBM-R administrations and whether CBM-R outcomes retain high criterion-related validity in such conditions. This study examined the reading performance of 239 second- to fifth-grade students with standard and modified CBM-R task demands. Students were instructed to do their best reading, fast accurate reading, or read with comprehension. Reading rate and comprehension performance was compared and evaluated along with criterion validity with the Gates MacGinitie Reading Comprehension Test. A repeated measures analysis of variance and test of simple effects were used to analyze performance within each grade. Statistically significant differences in reading rate (p <.05) were observed between the best and fastest reading conditions in all grades; differences were observed between best and comprehension conditions in only fourth grade. Criterion-related validity was moderately robust in all grades for all conditions (>0.60). The comprehension task did not improve the incremental validity when used with CBM-R. Students do not appear to engage in speed reading during standardized CBM-R administrations. Implications for practice and future research are discussed within the context of screening and progress monitoring respectively.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892561666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892561666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84892561666

VL - 42

SP - 415

EP - 436

JO - School Psychology Review

JF - School Psychology Review

SN - 0279-6015

IS - 4

ER -