Current status and best practices of shared governance in US pharmacy programs

Daniel R. Kennedy, T. Kristopher Harrell, Nicole M. Lodise, T. Joseph Mattingly, Jeffrey P. Norenberg, Kelly Ragucci, Paul Ranelli, Angela S. Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


Objective. To characterize shared governance in US schools and colleges of pharmacy and recom-mend best practices to promote faculty engagement and satisfaction. Findings. The literature review revealed only one study on governance in a pharmacy school and some data from an AACP Faculty Survey. Of the 926 faculty members who responded to the survey, the majority were satisfied or very satisfied with faculty governance (64%) and the level of input into faculty governance (63%) at their school. Faculty members in administrative positions and those at public institutions were more satisfied with governance. The forum resulted in the development of five themes: establish a clear vision of governance in all areas; ensure that faculty members are aware of their roles and responsibilities within the governance structure; ensure faculty members are able to join committees of interest; recognize and reward faculty contributions to governance; and involve all full-time faculty members in governance, regardless of their tenure status. Summary. Establishing shared governance within a school or college of pharmacy impacts overall faculty satisfaction and potentially faculty retention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number7281
Pages (from-to)909-918
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education
Issue number7
StatePublished - 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. All rights reserved.


  • Faculty affairs
  • Governance
  • Satisfaction
  • Shared governance


Dive into the research topics of 'Current status and best practices of shared governance in US pharmacy programs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this