Cultural Sensitivity and Cultural Tailoring: Lessons Learned and Refinements After Two Decades of Incorporating Culture in Health Communication Research

Derek M. Griffith, Caroline R. Efird, Monica L. Baskin, Monica Webb Hooper, Rachel E. Davis, Ken Resnicow

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this article, we examine progress and challenges in designing, implementing, and evaluating culturally sensitive behavioral interventions by tailoring health communication to groups or individuals. After defining common tailoring constructs (i.e., culture, race, and ethnicity), cultural sensitivity, and cultural tailoring, we examine when it is useful to culturally tailor and address cultural sensitivity in health communication by group tailoring or individual tailoring and when tailoring health communication may not be necessary or appropriate for achieving behavior change. After reviewing selected approaches to cultural tailoring, we critique the quality of research in this domain with a focus on the internal validity of empirical findings. Then we explore the ways in which cultural sensitivity, group targeting, and individual tailoring have incorporated culture in health promotion and health communication. We conclude by articulating yet unanswered questions and suggesting future directions to move the field forward.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-212
Number of pages18
JournalAnnual Review of Public Health
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 20 2024
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Annual Reviews Inc.. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • behavioral medicine
  • cultural sensitivity
  • health communication
  • health equity
  • health promotion
  • tailoring

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cultural Sensitivity and Cultural Tailoring: Lessons Learned and Refinements After Two Decades of Incorporating Culture in Health Communication Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this