TY - JOUR
T1 - Crystallization Propensity of Amorphous Pharmaceuticals
T2 - Kinetics and Thermodynamics
AU - Krishna Kumar, N. S.
AU - Suryanarayanan, Raj
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2022/2/7
Y1 - 2022/2/7
N2 - Four model compounds, nifedipine, indomethacin, felodipine, and ketoconazole, all with nearly identical glass transition temperatures, were chosen to study the effects of thermodynamics and molecular mobility on their crystallization propensities. The time and temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time of each compound was determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and enabled the generation of their time-temperature-transformation (TTT) diagrams. The relaxation times (τα) were measured by dielectric spectroscopy, and the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) and entropy (ΔS) difference between the crystalline and amorphous states were obtained by DSC. The temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time (τ0(T)) is a function of the thermodynamic activation barrier and the frequency of "attempted jumps"(1/τα(T)) to overcome the barrier. Even though the four model compounds exhibited very similar molecular mobility (relaxation time) over a wide range of temperatures, their crystallization propensities were very different. The observed difference in crystallization propensity was explained in terms of the difference in the thermodynamic barrier, and it is correlated to the empirical relation (TΔS3)/ΔG2.
AB - Four model compounds, nifedipine, indomethacin, felodipine, and ketoconazole, all with nearly identical glass transition temperatures, were chosen to study the effects of thermodynamics and molecular mobility on their crystallization propensities. The time and temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time of each compound was determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and enabled the generation of their time-temperature-transformation (TTT) diagrams. The relaxation times (τα) were measured by dielectric spectroscopy, and the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) and entropy (ΔS) difference between the crystalline and amorphous states were obtained by DSC. The temperature dependence of the crystallization induction time (τ0(T)) is a function of the thermodynamic activation barrier and the frequency of "attempted jumps"(1/τα(T)) to overcome the barrier. Even though the four model compounds exhibited very similar molecular mobility (relaxation time) over a wide range of temperatures, their crystallization propensities were very different. The observed difference in crystallization propensity was explained in terms of the difference in the thermodynamic barrier, and it is correlated to the empirical relation (TΔS3)/ΔG2.
KW - activation barrier
KW - amorphous pharmaceuticals
KW - crystallization
KW - molecular mobility
KW - time-temperature-transformation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122668787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122668787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00839
DO - 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00839
M3 - Article
C2 - 34979803
AN - SCOPUS:85122668787
SN - 1543-8384
VL - 19
SP - 472
EP - 483
JO - Molecular pharmaceutics
JF - Molecular pharmaceutics
IS - 2
ER -