TY - JOUR
T1 - Crowdsourcing Electronic Health Record Improvements at Scale across an Integrated Health Care Delivery System
AU - Rajamani, Geetanjali
AU - Diethelm, Molly
AU - Gunderson, Melissa A.
AU - Talluri, Venkata S.M.
AU - Motz, Patricia
AU - Steinhaus, Jennifer M.
AU - LaFlamme, Anne E.
AU - Jarabek, Bryan
AU - Christiaansen, Tori
AU - Blade, Jeffrey T.
AU - Badlani, Sameer
AU - Melton, Genevieve B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Georg Thieme Verlag. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - Background and Objective Despite widespread adoption of electronic health records (EHRs), these systems have significant room for improved efficiency and efficacy. While the idea of crowdsourcing EHR improvement ideas has been reported, little is known about how this might work across an integrated health care delivery system in practice. Methods Our program solicited EHR improvement submissions during two timeframes across 10 hospitals and 60 clinics in an upper-Midwest integrated health care delivery system. Submissions were primarily collected via an EHR help feature. Results A total of 262 and 294 submissions were received in 2019 and 2022, with a majority initiated from physicians (73.5 and 46.9%, 2019 and 2022) specializing in family medicine (52.0 and 59.3%). In 2022, the program reached a larger variety of personnel than 2019, with 53.0% of submissions from advanced practice providers, nurses, administrative staff, and other roles (p < 0.0001). Many ideas (36.4 and 50.0% in 2019 and 2022) reflected a lack of user understanding of EHR features and were addressed through training/education. Significant (27.1 and 25.9%) or simple (24.0 and 14.7%) EHR optimizations were required to address most remaining suggestions, with a number part of planned EHR improvement projects already (16.3 and 17.6%). Conclusion Our experience using a crowdsourcing approach for EHR improvement ideas provided clinicians and staff the opportunity to address frustrations with the EHR and offered concrete feedback and solutions. While previous studies have suggested EHR technology improvements as paramount, we observed large numbers of users having a misunderstanding of EHR features, highlighting the need for improved EHR user competency and training.
AB - Background and Objective Despite widespread adoption of electronic health records (EHRs), these systems have significant room for improved efficiency and efficacy. While the idea of crowdsourcing EHR improvement ideas has been reported, little is known about how this might work across an integrated health care delivery system in practice. Methods Our program solicited EHR improvement submissions during two timeframes across 10 hospitals and 60 clinics in an upper-Midwest integrated health care delivery system. Submissions were primarily collected via an EHR help feature. Results A total of 262 and 294 submissions were received in 2019 and 2022, with a majority initiated from physicians (73.5 and 46.9%, 2019 and 2022) specializing in family medicine (52.0 and 59.3%). In 2022, the program reached a larger variety of personnel than 2019, with 53.0% of submissions from advanced practice providers, nurses, administrative staff, and other roles (p < 0.0001). Many ideas (36.4 and 50.0% in 2019 and 2022) reflected a lack of user understanding of EHR features and were addressed through training/education. Significant (27.1 and 25.9%) or simple (24.0 and 14.7%) EHR optimizations were required to address most remaining suggestions, with a number part of planned EHR improvement projects already (16.3 and 17.6%). Conclusion Our experience using a crowdsourcing approach for EHR improvement ideas provided clinicians and staff the opportunity to address frustrations with the EHR and offered concrete feedback and solutions. While previous studies have suggested EHR technology improvements as paramount, we observed large numbers of users having a misunderstanding of EHR features, highlighting the need for improved EHR user competency and training.
KW - burnout
KW - clinical documentation
KW - crowdsourcing
KW - documentation burden
KW - electronic health records
KW - training and education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85158846076&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85158846076&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/s-0043-1767684
DO - 10.1055/s-0043-1767684
M3 - Article
C2 - 37164355
AN - SCOPUS:85158846076
SN - 1869-0327
VL - 14
SP - 356
EP - 364
JO - Applied clinical informatics
JF - Applied clinical informatics
IS - 2
ER -