Cross-validation of Peak Oxygen Consumption Prediction Models from OMNI Perceived Exertion

R. J. Mays, F. L. Goss, E. F. Nagle, M. Gallagher, L. Haile, M. A. Schafer, K. H. Kim, R. J. Robertson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study cross-validated statistical models for prediction of peak oxygen consumption using ratings of perceived exertion from the Adult OMNI Cycle Scale of Perceived Exertion. 74 participants (men: n=36; women: n=38) completed a graded cycle exercise test. Ratings of perceived exertion for the overall body, legs, and chest/breathing were recorded each test stage and entered into previously developed 3-stage peak oxygen consumption prediction models. There were no significant differences (p>0.05) between measured and predicted peak oxygen consumption from ratings of perceived exertion for the overall body, legs, and chest/breathing within men (mean±standard deviation: 3.16±0.52 vs. 2.92±0.33 vs. 2.90±0.29 vs. 2.90±0.26 L·min-1) and women (2.17±0.29 vs. 2.02±0.22 vs. 2.03±0.19 vs. 2.01±0.19 L·min-1) participants. Previously developed statistical models for prediction of peak oxygen consumption based on subpeak OMNI ratings of perceived exertion responses were similar to measured peak oxygen consumption in a separate group of participants. These findings provide practical implications for the use of the original statistical models in standard health-fitness settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)831-837
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume37
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Oxygen Consumption
Statistical Models
Leg
Respiration
Thorax
Exercise Test
Health

Keywords

  • cycle ergometry
  • exercise testing
  • prediction equations
  • undifferentiated and differentiated RPE

Cite this

Mays, R. J., Goss, F. L., Nagle, E. F., Gallagher, M., Haile, L., Schafer, M. A., ... Robertson, R. J. (2016). Cross-validation of Peak Oxygen Consumption Prediction Models from OMNI Perceived Exertion. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 37(10), 831-837. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-103029

Cross-validation of Peak Oxygen Consumption Prediction Models from OMNI Perceived Exertion. / Mays, R. J.; Goss, F. L.; Nagle, E. F.; Gallagher, M.; Haile, L.; Schafer, M. A.; Kim, K. H.; Robertson, R. J.

In: International Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 10, 01.09.2016, p. 831-837.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mays, RJ, Goss, FL, Nagle, EF, Gallagher, M, Haile, L, Schafer, MA, Kim, KH & Robertson, RJ 2016, 'Cross-validation of Peak Oxygen Consumption Prediction Models from OMNI Perceived Exertion' International Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 831-837. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-103029
Mays, R. J. ; Goss, F. L. ; Nagle, E. F. ; Gallagher, M. ; Haile, L. ; Schafer, M. A. ; Kim, K. H. ; Robertson, R. J. / Cross-validation of Peak Oxygen Consumption Prediction Models from OMNI Perceived Exertion. In: International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 37, No. 10. pp. 831-837.
@article{10c03516a0854da6a4c524a8d9e1c372,
title = "Cross-validation of Peak Oxygen Consumption Prediction Models from OMNI Perceived Exertion",
abstract = "This study cross-validated statistical models for prediction of peak oxygen consumption using ratings of perceived exertion from the Adult OMNI Cycle Scale of Perceived Exertion. 74 participants (men: n=36; women: n=38) completed a graded cycle exercise test. Ratings of perceived exertion for the overall body, legs, and chest/breathing were recorded each test stage and entered into previously developed 3-stage peak oxygen consumption prediction models. There were no significant differences (p>0.05) between measured and predicted peak oxygen consumption from ratings of perceived exertion for the overall body, legs, and chest/breathing within men (mean±standard deviation: 3.16±0.52 vs. 2.92±0.33 vs. 2.90±0.29 vs. 2.90±0.26 L·min-1) and women (2.17±0.29 vs. 2.02±0.22 vs. 2.03±0.19 vs. 2.01±0.19 L·min-1) participants. Previously developed statistical models for prediction of peak oxygen consumption based on subpeak OMNI ratings of perceived exertion responses were similar to measured peak oxygen consumption in a separate group of participants. These findings provide practical implications for the use of the original statistical models in standard health-fitness settings.",
keywords = "cycle ergometry, exercise testing, prediction equations, undifferentiated and differentiated RPE",
author = "Mays, {R. J.} and Goss, {F. L.} and Nagle, {E. F.} and M. Gallagher and L. Haile and Schafer, {M. A.} and Kim, {K. H.} and Robertson, {R. J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0042-103029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "831--837",
journal = "International Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0172-4622",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-validation of Peak Oxygen Consumption Prediction Models from OMNI Perceived Exertion

AU - Mays, R. J.

AU - Goss, F. L.

AU - Nagle, E. F.

AU - Gallagher, M.

AU - Haile, L.

AU - Schafer, M. A.

AU - Kim, K. H.

AU - Robertson, R. J.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - This study cross-validated statistical models for prediction of peak oxygen consumption using ratings of perceived exertion from the Adult OMNI Cycle Scale of Perceived Exertion. 74 participants (men: n=36; women: n=38) completed a graded cycle exercise test. Ratings of perceived exertion for the overall body, legs, and chest/breathing were recorded each test stage and entered into previously developed 3-stage peak oxygen consumption prediction models. There were no significant differences (p>0.05) between measured and predicted peak oxygen consumption from ratings of perceived exertion for the overall body, legs, and chest/breathing within men (mean±standard deviation: 3.16±0.52 vs. 2.92±0.33 vs. 2.90±0.29 vs. 2.90±0.26 L·min-1) and women (2.17±0.29 vs. 2.02±0.22 vs. 2.03±0.19 vs. 2.01±0.19 L·min-1) participants. Previously developed statistical models for prediction of peak oxygen consumption based on subpeak OMNI ratings of perceived exertion responses were similar to measured peak oxygen consumption in a separate group of participants. These findings provide practical implications for the use of the original statistical models in standard health-fitness settings.

AB - This study cross-validated statistical models for prediction of peak oxygen consumption using ratings of perceived exertion from the Adult OMNI Cycle Scale of Perceived Exertion. 74 participants (men: n=36; women: n=38) completed a graded cycle exercise test. Ratings of perceived exertion for the overall body, legs, and chest/breathing were recorded each test stage and entered into previously developed 3-stage peak oxygen consumption prediction models. There were no significant differences (p>0.05) between measured and predicted peak oxygen consumption from ratings of perceived exertion for the overall body, legs, and chest/breathing within men (mean±standard deviation: 3.16±0.52 vs. 2.92±0.33 vs. 2.90±0.29 vs. 2.90±0.26 L·min-1) and women (2.17±0.29 vs. 2.02±0.22 vs. 2.03±0.19 vs. 2.01±0.19 L·min-1) participants. Previously developed statistical models for prediction of peak oxygen consumption based on subpeak OMNI ratings of perceived exertion responses were similar to measured peak oxygen consumption in a separate group of participants. These findings provide practical implications for the use of the original statistical models in standard health-fitness settings.

KW - cycle ergometry

KW - exercise testing

KW - prediction equations

KW - undifferentiated and differentiated RPE

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978472998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978472998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0042-103029

DO - 10.1055/s-0042-103029

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 831

EP - 837

JO - International Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - International Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0172-4622

IS - 10

ER -