Cross-sector collaboration on Safe Routes to School policy advocacy and implementation: A mixed methods evaluation from Minnesota

Jennifer E. Pelletier, Melissa N Laska, Susie Nanney, Rebekah J Pratt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Cross-sector collaboration has been a crucial element of planning and implementing large-scale obesity prevention-related policies and programs in the United States, including Safe Routes to School (SRTS), which promotes walking and bicycling through physical infrastructure changes and programmatic efforts. Minnesota provides a unique opportunity to evaluate a collaborative partnership that successfully implemented and institutionalized one of the first state-funded SRTS initiatives in the country and included close collaboration between transportation and health officials and advocates at both the state and local levels. This theoretically informed mixed methods case study identified and described the roles of both central and peripheral members of a collaborative SRTS partnership in Minnesota. Qualitative analyses of 18 stakeholder interviews identified key aspects of success, including passionate and skilled individuals with a common objective, structures that facilitated work across partnership functions and geographies, strong interpersonal and inter-organizational relationships, capacity for implementation and advocacy, and information and knowledge sharing. Findings indicate that contributors to partnership success may differ across multiple geographic levels and partnership functions. Contextual factors external to the partnership are also likely to affect whether partnerships achieve their goals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)132-140
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Transport and Health
Volume9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2018

Keywords

  • Collaboration
  • Implementation
  • Physical activity
  • Policy
  • Safe Routes to School

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-sector collaboration on Safe Routes to School policy advocacy and implementation: A mixed methods evaluation from Minnesota'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this