Criteria for the safety evaluation of flavoring substances

The Expert Panel of the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association

Robert L. Smith, Samuel M. Cohen, John Doull, Victor J. Feron, Jay I. Goodman, Lawrence J. Marnett, Ian C. Munro, Philip S. Portoghese, William J. Waddell, Bernard M. Wagner, Timothy B. Adams

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current status of the GRAS evaluation program of flavoring substances operated by the Expert Panel of FEMA is discussed. The Panel maintains a rigorous rotating 10-year program of continuous review of scientific data related to the safety evaluation of flavoring substances. The Panel concluded a comprehensive review of the GRAS (GRASa) status of flavors in 1985 and began a second comprehensive review of the same substances and any recently GRAS materials in 1994. This second re-evaluation program of chemical groups of flavor ingredients, recognized as the GRAS reaffirmation (GRASr) program, is scheduled to be completed in 2005. The evaluation criteria used by the Panel during the GRASr program reflects the significant impact of advances in biochemistry, molecular biology and toxicology that have allowed for a more complete understanding of the molecular events associated with toxicity. The interpretation of novel data on the relationship of dose to metabolic fate, formation of protein and DNA adducts, enzyme induction, and the cascade of cellular events leading to toxicity provides a more comprehensive basis upon which to evaluate the safety of the intake of flavor ingredients under conditions of intended use. The interpretation of genotoxicity data is evaluated in the context of other data such as in vivo animal metabolism and lifetime animal feeding studies that are more closely related to actual human experience. Data are not viewed in isolation, but comprise one component that is factored into the Panel's overall safety assessment. The convergence of different methodologies that assess intake of flavoring substances provides a greater degree of confidence in the estimated intake of flavor ingredients. When these intakes are compared to dose levels that in some cases result in related chemical and biological effects and the subsequent toxicity, it is clear that exposure to these substances through flavor use presents no significant human health risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1141-1177
Number of pages37
JournalFood and Chemical Toxicology
Volume43
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2005

Fingerprint

Flavors
flavorings
flavor
Program Evaluation
Safety
extracts
Toxicity
program evaluation
ingredients
toxicity
Enzyme Induction
DNA Adducts
Animals
Biochemistry
Toxicology
Molecular Biology
DNA adducts
Molecular biology
safety assessment
Health risks

Cite this

Smith, R. L., Cohen, S. M., Doull, J., Feron, V. J., Goodman, J. I., Marnett, L. J., ... Adams, T. B. (2005). Criteria for the safety evaluation of flavoring substances: The Expert Panel of the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 43(8), 1141-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2004.11.012

Criteria for the safety evaluation of flavoring substances : The Expert Panel of the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association. / Smith, Robert L.; Cohen, Samuel M.; Doull, John; Feron, Victor J.; Goodman, Jay I.; Marnett, Lawrence J.; Munro, Ian C.; Portoghese, Philip S.; Waddell, William J.; Wagner, Bernard M.; Adams, Timothy B.

In: Food and Chemical Toxicology, Vol. 43, No. 8, 01.08.2005, p. 1141-1177.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Smith, RL, Cohen, SM, Doull, J, Feron, VJ, Goodman, JI, Marnett, LJ, Munro, IC, Portoghese, PS, Waddell, WJ, Wagner, BM & Adams, TB 2005, 'Criteria for the safety evaluation of flavoring substances: The Expert Panel of the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association', Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1141-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2004.11.012
Smith, Robert L. ; Cohen, Samuel M. ; Doull, John ; Feron, Victor J. ; Goodman, Jay I. ; Marnett, Lawrence J. ; Munro, Ian C. ; Portoghese, Philip S. ; Waddell, William J. ; Wagner, Bernard M. ; Adams, Timothy B. / Criteria for the safety evaluation of flavoring substances : The Expert Panel of the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association. In: Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2005 ; Vol. 43, No. 8. pp. 1141-1177.
@article{a3ec6a161625408896ca4ef6f954b4e2,
title = "Criteria for the safety evaluation of flavoring substances: The Expert Panel of the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association",
abstract = "The current status of the GRAS evaluation program of flavoring substances operated by the Expert Panel of FEMA is discussed. The Panel maintains a rigorous rotating 10-year program of continuous review of scientific data related to the safety evaluation of flavoring substances. The Panel concluded a comprehensive review of the GRAS (GRASa) status of flavors in 1985 and began a second comprehensive review of the same substances and any recently GRAS materials in 1994. This second re-evaluation program of chemical groups of flavor ingredients, recognized as the GRAS reaffirmation (GRASr) program, is scheduled to be completed in 2005. The evaluation criteria used by the Panel during the GRASr program reflects the significant impact of advances in biochemistry, molecular biology and toxicology that have allowed for a more complete understanding of the molecular events associated with toxicity. The interpretation of novel data on the relationship of dose to metabolic fate, formation of protein and DNA adducts, enzyme induction, and the cascade of cellular events leading to toxicity provides a more comprehensive basis upon which to evaluate the safety of the intake of flavor ingredients under conditions of intended use. The interpretation of genotoxicity data is evaluated in the context of other data such as in vivo animal metabolism and lifetime animal feeding studies that are more closely related to actual human experience. Data are not viewed in isolation, but comprise one component that is factored into the Panel's overall safety assessment. The convergence of different methodologies that assess intake of flavoring substances provides a greater degree of confidence in the estimated intake of flavor ingredients. When these intakes are compared to dose levels that in some cases result in related chemical and biological effects and the subsequent toxicity, it is clear that exposure to these substances through flavor use presents no significant human health risk.",
author = "Smith, {Robert L.} and Cohen, {Samuel M.} and John Doull and Feron, {Victor J.} and Goodman, {Jay I.} and Marnett, {Lawrence J.} and Munro, {Ian C.} and Portoghese, {Philip S.} and Waddell, {William J.} and Wagner, {Bernard M.} and Adams, {Timothy B.}",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.fct.2004.11.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "1141--1177",
journal = "Food and Chemical Toxicology",
issn = "0278-6915",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criteria for the safety evaluation of flavoring substances

T2 - The Expert Panel of the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association

AU - Smith, Robert L.

AU - Cohen, Samuel M.

AU - Doull, John

AU - Feron, Victor J.

AU - Goodman, Jay I.

AU - Marnett, Lawrence J.

AU - Munro, Ian C.

AU - Portoghese, Philip S.

AU - Waddell, William J.

AU - Wagner, Bernard M.

AU - Adams, Timothy B.

PY - 2005/8/1

Y1 - 2005/8/1

N2 - The current status of the GRAS evaluation program of flavoring substances operated by the Expert Panel of FEMA is discussed. The Panel maintains a rigorous rotating 10-year program of continuous review of scientific data related to the safety evaluation of flavoring substances. The Panel concluded a comprehensive review of the GRAS (GRASa) status of flavors in 1985 and began a second comprehensive review of the same substances and any recently GRAS materials in 1994. This second re-evaluation program of chemical groups of flavor ingredients, recognized as the GRAS reaffirmation (GRASr) program, is scheduled to be completed in 2005. The evaluation criteria used by the Panel during the GRASr program reflects the significant impact of advances in biochemistry, molecular biology and toxicology that have allowed for a more complete understanding of the molecular events associated with toxicity. The interpretation of novel data on the relationship of dose to metabolic fate, formation of protein and DNA adducts, enzyme induction, and the cascade of cellular events leading to toxicity provides a more comprehensive basis upon which to evaluate the safety of the intake of flavor ingredients under conditions of intended use. The interpretation of genotoxicity data is evaluated in the context of other data such as in vivo animal metabolism and lifetime animal feeding studies that are more closely related to actual human experience. Data are not viewed in isolation, but comprise one component that is factored into the Panel's overall safety assessment. The convergence of different methodologies that assess intake of flavoring substances provides a greater degree of confidence in the estimated intake of flavor ingredients. When these intakes are compared to dose levels that in some cases result in related chemical and biological effects and the subsequent toxicity, it is clear that exposure to these substances through flavor use presents no significant human health risk.

AB - The current status of the GRAS evaluation program of flavoring substances operated by the Expert Panel of FEMA is discussed. The Panel maintains a rigorous rotating 10-year program of continuous review of scientific data related to the safety evaluation of flavoring substances. The Panel concluded a comprehensive review of the GRAS (GRASa) status of flavors in 1985 and began a second comprehensive review of the same substances and any recently GRAS materials in 1994. This second re-evaluation program of chemical groups of flavor ingredients, recognized as the GRAS reaffirmation (GRASr) program, is scheduled to be completed in 2005. The evaluation criteria used by the Panel during the GRASr program reflects the significant impact of advances in biochemistry, molecular biology and toxicology that have allowed for a more complete understanding of the molecular events associated with toxicity. The interpretation of novel data on the relationship of dose to metabolic fate, formation of protein and DNA adducts, enzyme induction, and the cascade of cellular events leading to toxicity provides a more comprehensive basis upon which to evaluate the safety of the intake of flavor ingredients under conditions of intended use. The interpretation of genotoxicity data is evaluated in the context of other data such as in vivo animal metabolism and lifetime animal feeding studies that are more closely related to actual human experience. Data are not viewed in isolation, but comprise one component that is factored into the Panel's overall safety assessment. The convergence of different methodologies that assess intake of flavoring substances provides a greater degree of confidence in the estimated intake of flavor ingredients. When these intakes are compared to dose levels that in some cases result in related chemical and biological effects and the subsequent toxicity, it is clear that exposure to these substances through flavor use presents no significant human health risk.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20444399087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20444399087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fct.2004.11.012

DO - 10.1016/j.fct.2004.11.012

M3 - Review article

VL - 43

SP - 1141

EP - 1177

JO - Food and Chemical Toxicology

JF - Food and Chemical Toxicology

SN - 0278-6915

IS - 8

ER -