COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the LGBTQ+ Population: A systematic review

Ishan Garg, Hamza Hanif, Nismat Javed, Ramsha Abbas, Samir Mirza, Muhammad Ali Javaid, Suman Pal, Rahul Shekhar, Abu Baker Sheikh

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

52 Scopus citations

Abstract

The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disproportionately impacted lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (LGBTQ+) people. Despite developing safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines, LGBTQ+ communities still faces challenges due to inequitable access and vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy is a delay in the acceptance or refusal of vaccines despite the availability of vaccination services. Various studies have explored and tried to address factors influencing vaccine hesitancy. However, the LGBTQ+ population remains under- and misrepresented in many of these studies. According to the few studies that have focused on the LGBTQ+ population, several factors influencing vaccine hesitancy have been identified, with the most common factors in studies being concern about vaccine safety, vaccine efficacy, and history of bad experiences with healthcare providers. In order to rebuild the confidence of LGBTQ+ people in vaccines, governments, healthcare policymakers, and healthcare providers need to start by acknowledging, and then resolving, these disparities; building trust; dismantling systemic suppression and discrimination; and prioritizing the inclusion of LGBTQ+ people in research studies and public health policies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)872-887
Number of pages16
JournalInfectious Disease Reports
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Keywords

  • Bisexual
  • COVID-19
  • Gay
  • LGBTQ+
  • Lesbian
  • Queer
  • Transgender
  • Vaccine hesitancy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the LGBTQ+ Population: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this