Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Could ralph nader's entrance and exit have helped al gore? The impact of decoy dynamics on consumer choice

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

People are frequently faced with making a new choice decision after a preferred option becomes unavailable. Prior research on the attraction effect has demonstrated how the introduction of an option into a choice set increases the share of one of the original options. The authors examine the related but previously unaddressed issue of whether the unexpected exit of an option from a choice set returns the choice shares of the original options to the status quo. In a series of experiments, they observe that when an option turns out to be unselectable following a choice problem in which it was selectable, the choice shares of the remaining options are predictably different from those of a choice problem in which the option was unselectable from the start. They also observe that this attraction effect due to the disappearance of a decoy is likely a consequence of changes in the importance of decision criteria. They conclude with a discussion of the theoretical and managerial implications of the research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)330-343
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Marketing Research
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Consumer choice
  • Decoy effect
  • Phantom decoy
  • Political choice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Could ralph nader's entrance and exit have helped al gore? The impact of decoy dynamics on consumer choice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this