Abstract
The authors regret that there is a mistake in the results section (paragraph with subheader “All-cause death”), which incorrectly interprets results presented in the supplementary material. With regards to the relative effect of high-dose vs. standard-dose influenza vaccine against all-cause death, the sentence currently reads: “Positive effects were observed in those free of cardiovascular disease and in individuals aged 65–79 years, respectively statistically significant and insignificant." The correct phrasing should be “respectively statistically non-significant and significant.” The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 106270 |
| Journal | Journal of Infection |
| Volume | 89 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Nov 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 The Author(s)
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “The relative vaccine effectiveness of high-dose vs standard-dose influenza vaccines in preventing hospitalization and mortality: A meta-analysis of evidence from randomized trials” [J Infect 89 (2024) 106187] (Journal of Infection (2024) 89(1), (S016344532400121X), (10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106187))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS