Corrigendum to “The relative vaccine effectiveness of high-dose vs standard-dose influenza vaccines in preventing hospitalization and mortality: A meta-analysis of evidence from randomized trials” [J Infect 89 (2024) 106187] (Journal of Infection (2024) 89(1), (S016344532400121X), (10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106187))

Kristoffer Grundtvig Skaarup, Mats Christian Højbjerg Lassen, Daniel Modin, Niklas Dyrby Johansen, Matthew M. Loiacono, Rebecca C. Harris, Jason K.H. Lee, Marine Dufournet, Orly Vardeny, Alexander Peikert, Brian Claggett, Scott D. Solomon, Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen, Tor Biering-Sørensen

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

The authors regret that there is a mistake in the results section (paragraph with subheader “All-cause death”), which incorrectly interprets results presented in the supplementary material. With regards to the relative effect of high-dose vs. standard-dose influenza vaccine against all-cause death, the sentence currently reads: “Positive effects were observed in those free of cardiovascular disease and in individuals aged 65–79 years, respectively statistically significant and insignificant." The correct phrasing should be “respectively statistically non-significant and significant.” The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number106270
JournalJournal of Infection
Volume89
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Published Erratum

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “The relative vaccine effectiveness of high-dose vs standard-dose influenza vaccines in preventing hospitalization and mortality: A meta-analysis of evidence from randomized trials” [J Infect 89 (2024) 106187] (Journal of Infection (2024) 89(1), (S016344532400121X), (10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106187))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this