In the original version of the supplementary materials, there was an error in the analysis code that led to incorrect calculations of d' and c. These original calculations were unintentionally based on half the original hit and false alarm rates. The corresponding supplementary results (paragraphs 2 and 3 of S1 Text and supplementary Table 4)and associated supplementary figures (S3, S4, S7, and S8)have been corrected in the revised supplementary file. The corrected supplemental analyses affect one sentence in the main article, which should read as follows (last sentence of section 3.1.3, corrected text underlined): “Analogous repeated-measures ANOVAs on MBEA performance using sensitivity (d’)and response bias (c)demonstrated that improvements in all groups were due to increased sensitivity along with a decreased response bias.” No other parts of the main article are affected by these corrections. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Published Erratum