In the published article, there were two errors in Table 4, Post-hoc cross-sectional analysis exploring the main effect for group, as published. There is a missing “<” symbol for understanding scores at 24-months, and an incorrect “<” symbol for object use scores at 24 months under the post-Hoc comparisons column. The corrected Table 4, Post-hoc cross-sectional analysis exploring the main effect for group, appears below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions made in the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Bibliographical notePublisher Copyright:
© 2023 Ravi, Bradshaw, Abdi, Meera, Parish-Morris, Yankowitz, Paterson, Dager, Burrows, Chappell, St.John, Estes, Piven, Swanson and the IBIS Network.
- social communication