Correlates of support for a nicotine-reduction policy in smokers with 6-week exposure to very low nicotine cigarettes

Rachel L. Denlinger-Apte, Jennifer W. Tidey, Joe Koopmeiners, Dorothy K Hatsukami, Tracy T. Smith, Lauren R. Pacek, F. Joseph Mcclernon, Eric C. Donny

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background The US Food and Drug Administration recently issued an advanced notice of proposed rule-making for reducing the nicotine content in cigarettes to a minimally addictive level. Very little is known about whether use of very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes affects support for a nicotine reduction policy. Objective This study examined the effects of using VLNC versus usual brand (UB) cigarettes on support for a nicotine reduction policy and determined whether participant characteristics and responses to VLNC cigarettes were associated with policy support. Methods Participants from a cigarette trial who were assigned to either 0.4 mg nicotine/g tobacco research cigarettes or their UB for 6 weeks were asked about their support for the policy. ‡ 2 tests were used to compare support for the policy between cigarette conditions and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess covariates associated with policy support. Findings Policy support did not differ by condition. After 6 weeks of using VLNC cigarettes, 50% of participants supported the policy, 26% opposed and 24% responded 'Don't Know'. Support was higher among those adherent to smoking only VLNC cigarettes (65%) compared with those who were non-adherent (44%). Older participants and those interested in quitting had increased odds of support. Cigarette satisfaction, perceived harm and perceived nicotine content were not significantly associated with support. Conclusions Smoking VLNC cigarettes did not affect support for a nicotine reduction policy. Understanding predictors of policy support and opposition will help public health officials to maximise the public health acceptance and impact of this policy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01681875 Post-Results).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)352-355
Number of pages4
JournalTobacco control
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Nicotine
Tobacco Products
nicotine
smoking
Public Health
Smoking
public health
United States Food and Drug Administration
Tobacco
Logistic Models
opposition
Regression Analysis
acceptance
logistics

Keywords

  • harm reduction
  • nicotine
  • public policy

Cite this

Correlates of support for a nicotine-reduction policy in smokers with 6-week exposure to very low nicotine cigarettes. / Denlinger-Apte, Rachel L.; Tidey, Jennifer W.; Koopmeiners, Joe; Hatsukami, Dorothy K; Smith, Tracy T.; Pacek, Lauren R.; Mcclernon, F. Joseph; Donny, Eric C.

In: Tobacco control, Vol. 28, No. 3, 01.05.2019, p. 352-355.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Denlinger-Apte, Rachel L. ; Tidey, Jennifer W. ; Koopmeiners, Joe ; Hatsukami, Dorothy K ; Smith, Tracy T. ; Pacek, Lauren R. ; Mcclernon, F. Joseph ; Donny, Eric C. / Correlates of support for a nicotine-reduction policy in smokers with 6-week exposure to very low nicotine cigarettes. In: Tobacco control. 2019 ; Vol. 28, No. 3. pp. 352-355.
@article{b15c35b1189c45f0b4238645b7440c71,
title = "Correlates of support for a nicotine-reduction policy in smokers with 6-week exposure to very low nicotine cigarettes",
abstract = "Background The US Food and Drug Administration recently issued an advanced notice of proposed rule-making for reducing the nicotine content in cigarettes to a minimally addictive level. Very little is known about whether use of very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes affects support for a nicotine reduction policy. Objective This study examined the effects of using VLNC versus usual brand (UB) cigarettes on support for a nicotine reduction policy and determined whether participant characteristics and responses to VLNC cigarettes were associated with policy support. Methods Participants from a cigarette trial who were assigned to either 0.4 mg nicotine/g tobacco research cigarettes or their UB for 6 weeks were asked about their support for the policy. ‡ 2 tests were used to compare support for the policy between cigarette conditions and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess covariates associated with policy support. Findings Policy support did not differ by condition. After 6 weeks of using VLNC cigarettes, 50{\%} of participants supported the policy, 26{\%} opposed and 24{\%} responded 'Don't Know'. Support was higher among those adherent to smoking only VLNC cigarettes (65{\%}) compared with those who were non-adherent (44{\%}). Older participants and those interested in quitting had increased odds of support. Cigarette satisfaction, perceived harm and perceived nicotine content were not significantly associated with support. Conclusions Smoking VLNC cigarettes did not affect support for a nicotine reduction policy. Understanding predictors of policy support and opposition will help public health officials to maximise the public health acceptance and impact of this policy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01681875 Post-Results).",
keywords = "harm reduction, nicotine, public policy",
author = "Denlinger-Apte, {Rachel L.} and Tidey, {Jennifer W.} and Joe Koopmeiners and Hatsukami, {Dorothy K} and Smith, {Tracy T.} and Pacek, {Lauren R.} and Mcclernon, {F. Joseph} and Donny, {Eric C.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054622",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "352--355",
journal = "Tobacco Control",
issn = "0964-4563",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correlates of support for a nicotine-reduction policy in smokers with 6-week exposure to very low nicotine cigarettes

AU - Denlinger-Apte, Rachel L.

AU - Tidey, Jennifer W.

AU - Koopmeiners, Joe

AU - Hatsukami, Dorothy K

AU - Smith, Tracy T.

AU - Pacek, Lauren R.

AU - Mcclernon, F. Joseph

AU - Donny, Eric C.

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Background The US Food and Drug Administration recently issued an advanced notice of proposed rule-making for reducing the nicotine content in cigarettes to a minimally addictive level. Very little is known about whether use of very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes affects support for a nicotine reduction policy. Objective This study examined the effects of using VLNC versus usual brand (UB) cigarettes on support for a nicotine reduction policy and determined whether participant characteristics and responses to VLNC cigarettes were associated with policy support. Methods Participants from a cigarette trial who were assigned to either 0.4 mg nicotine/g tobacco research cigarettes or their UB for 6 weeks were asked about their support for the policy. ‡ 2 tests were used to compare support for the policy between cigarette conditions and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess covariates associated with policy support. Findings Policy support did not differ by condition. After 6 weeks of using VLNC cigarettes, 50% of participants supported the policy, 26% opposed and 24% responded 'Don't Know'. Support was higher among those adherent to smoking only VLNC cigarettes (65%) compared with those who were non-adherent (44%). Older participants and those interested in quitting had increased odds of support. Cigarette satisfaction, perceived harm and perceived nicotine content were not significantly associated with support. Conclusions Smoking VLNC cigarettes did not affect support for a nicotine reduction policy. Understanding predictors of policy support and opposition will help public health officials to maximise the public health acceptance and impact of this policy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01681875 Post-Results).

AB - Background The US Food and Drug Administration recently issued an advanced notice of proposed rule-making for reducing the nicotine content in cigarettes to a minimally addictive level. Very little is known about whether use of very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes affects support for a nicotine reduction policy. Objective This study examined the effects of using VLNC versus usual brand (UB) cigarettes on support for a nicotine reduction policy and determined whether participant characteristics and responses to VLNC cigarettes were associated with policy support. Methods Participants from a cigarette trial who were assigned to either 0.4 mg nicotine/g tobacco research cigarettes or their UB for 6 weeks were asked about their support for the policy. ‡ 2 tests were used to compare support for the policy between cigarette conditions and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess covariates associated with policy support. Findings Policy support did not differ by condition. After 6 weeks of using VLNC cigarettes, 50% of participants supported the policy, 26% opposed and 24% responded 'Don't Know'. Support was higher among those adherent to smoking only VLNC cigarettes (65%) compared with those who were non-adherent (44%). Older participants and those interested in quitting had increased odds of support. Cigarette satisfaction, perceived harm and perceived nicotine content were not significantly associated with support. Conclusions Smoking VLNC cigarettes did not affect support for a nicotine reduction policy. Understanding predictors of policy support and opposition will help public health officials to maximise the public health acceptance and impact of this policy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01681875 Post-Results).

KW - harm reduction

KW - nicotine

KW - public policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056100586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056100586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054622

DO - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054622

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 352

EP - 355

JO - Tobacco Control

JF - Tobacco Control

SN - 0964-4563

IS - 3

ER -