Correction to: Histological lesions and replication sites of pcv3 in naturally infected pigs (Animals 2021, 11, 1520)

Elisa Rigo De Conti, Talita Pilar Resende, Lacey Marshall-Lund, Albert Rovira, Fabio Augusto Vannucci

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

The authors wish to make the following correction to this paper [1]: Figure/Table Legends In the original article, there was a mistake in the legends for Figure 4 and Figure 5. The correct legends appear below. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated. 1st paragraph, page 4: Lymphoplasmacytic periarteritis was the most frequently observed lesion in the kidney samples and in lymph node samples (Table 1, Figure 3a). Lymphoplasmacytic periarteritis was also observed in liver and pancreas (Figure 5a) and spleen samples (Figure 4a). Other less frequent histopathological lesions are presented in Table 1. 2nd paragraph, page 4: The other organs with PCV3-ISH-RNA positive signals were kidney (9/13), liver (9/11), spleen (10/12) (Figure 4b) and lymph node (5/6) (Figure 3b). The distribution of the PCV3-ISH-RNA positive signals (Table 3) was predominantly multifocal (72/84). Legends: Figure 4 (a) “Lymph node” needs to be replaced by “Spleen”. (b) “Lymph node” needs to be replaced by “Spleen”. Figure 5 (a) “Liver” needs to be replaced by “Pancreas”. (b) “Liver” needs to be replaced by “Pancreas”. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience to the readers caused by these errors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number3277
JournalAnimals
Volume11
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, MDPI. All rights reserved.

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Published Erratum

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Histological lesions and replication sites of pcv3 in naturally infected pigs (Animals 2021, 11, 1520)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this