In the original article, the legend within Fig. 3 incorrectly read as ‘*p < 0.10, **p < 0.05, ***p > 0.01’. This has now been changed to ‘*p < 0.10, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01’. This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article. The authors would like to apologise for this error.
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Published Erratum