Correction Experiences on Social Media During COVID-19

Leticia Bode, Emily K. Vraga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations


Despite a wealth of research examining the effectiveness of correction of misinformation, not enough is known about how people experience such correction when it occurs on social media. Using a study of US adults in late March 2020, we measure how often people witness correction, correct others, or are corrected themselves, using the case of COVID-19 misinformation on social media. Descriptively, our results suggest that all three experiences related to correction on social media are relatively common and occur across partisan divides. Importantly, a majority of those who report seeing misinformation also report seeing it corrected, and a majority of those who report sharing misinformation report being corrected by others. Those with more education are more likely to engage in correction, and younger respondents are more likely to report all three experiences with correction. While experiences with correction are generally unrelated to misperceptions about COVID-19, those who correct others have higher COVID-19 misperceptions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSocial Media and Society
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The author(s) received financial support for this article from the University of Minnesota.

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.


  • COVID-19
  • correction
  • misinformation
  • social media


Dive into the research topics of 'Correction Experiences on Social Media During COVID-19'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this