Correcting misperceptions about genetically modified foods on social media: The impact of experts, users, and social media heuristics

Leticia Bode, Emily K Vraga, Melissa Tully

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We experimentally test whether expert organizations on social media can correct misperceptions of the scientific consensus on the safety of genetically modified (GM) food for human consumption, as well as what role social media cues, in the form of “likes,” play in that process. We find expert organizations highlighting scientific consensus on GM food safety reduces consensus misperceptions among the public, leading to lower GM misperceptions and boosting related consumption behaviors in line with the gateway belief model. Expert organizations’ credibility may increase as a result of correction, but popularity cues do not seem to affect misperceptions or credibility.
Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalScience Communication
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 24 2020

Keywords

  • genetically modified food
  • gateway belief model
  • Misinformation
  • Credibility
  • social media
  • heuristics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correcting misperceptions about genetically modified foods on social media: The impact of experts, users, and social media heuristics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this